Prabhakaran video song | bright time (#NaamThamizharKatchi)
رسينا البلوشي
அண்ணா என் உயிர் உள்ள வரை இதய துடிப்பு எமது அண்ணாவின் பெயரைச் சொல்லும்.
(Google translation: "As long as my brother is alive my heartbeat will say our brother's name.")
Suresh Wanayalae:
Karuna Amman Parliament Speech 2015 - WHO SUPPORTED LTTE?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3XpYynWDkU
Suresh Wanayalae:
Prabhakaran was a christian. And church helped his terrorism, because they have a religious hate.
Suresh Wanayalae:
Karuna Amman explained how Former Sri Lankan President (from UNP party) Premadasa supported LTTE terrorists. That president (who didn't have a good Buddhist background because he went to christian schools. Eg: Lorenz College, St' Joseph's College, under Rector Fr. Le Goc.) gave weapons and money to LTTE to grow terrorists from around 300 to around 5000. That was a political game. And before that a formar christian and a formar president (from UNP party) JR Jayavardana didn't take enough actions to stop attacking tamils after LTTE killed 13 sinhalese soldiers. That formar christian president increased that hate between tamils and sinhalese.
Suresh Wanayalae:
During the control of the UNP govenment in Sri Lanka the LTTE cadres lined up 600 to 774 police officers and shot them dead (in 1990). Most Sinhalese and some muslims had to leave north Sri Lanka. Most Tamils, Hindus, Muslims and Christians voted for the UNP party. And during the time of negotiations the LTTE became stronger. The UNP govenment didn't take enough actions against Muslim extremists before they attack churches and hotels on Easter Sunday (21-04-2019). It seems that the UNP govenment was listening to minorities more than listening to the Buddhist majority in Sri Lanka, and that helped minorities develop terrorism etc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Suresh Wanayalae:
Hindus have a culture of burning a statue of a Sri Lankan king Ravana. That means maybe some Hindus have a cultural hate on that Sri Lankan king. There are wars in Hindu books (Eg: Mahabharat). And most hindus worship violent gods too (Eg: Kali goddess), so that can be a religious reason to continue hate in Tamil hindus. Sometimes humans are stupid enough to use only the bad side of a religion, so a religion should be perfectly peaceful like Buddhism. Buddhism challenged Brahmanism (Eg: Caste System), so I think that is why some indians developed Hinduism with some new stories, and all the Sanskrit texts are not much older than 500 BCE (and written almost after the enlightenment of the Buddha).
Suresh Wanayalae:
The UNP government used police and paramilitary to develop a conflict between Tamils and Sinhalese. I guess maybe that is what the LTTE (which started operation from 1976) wanted to do to get international support to divide Sri Lanka. Major conflicts started after the "Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP)" (Buddhist majority) lost the political power and "United National Party (UNP)" (United Minorities) got the political power from 1977 to 1994 with the leadership of Junius Richard Jayewardene who was the President of Sri Lanka from 1978 to 1989. Police and government-sponsored paramilitaries set fire to the Jaffna public library and destroyed it completely just because three Sinhalese policemen were killed (according to wikipedia). And also a local Hindu temple and the head office of a Tamil political party (TULF) was destroyed (maybe to make Tamils move away from politics). The office of the Eelanadu, a local newspaper, was also destroyed. Statues of Tamil cultural and religious figures were destroyed or defaced. Maybe the Christian background of the UNP party was also a reason for all those activities because the Christians in Sri Lanka were strong (including Ex-Christians) because the British Commonwealth retained Sri Lanka until 1972. Members of the ruling UNP (including J.R. Jayewardene) escalated violence with public participation and killed more than 400 tamils, and people became homeless and shops were destroyed (in July 1983) just because 13 Sri Lanka Army soldiers were killed by LTTE, and ruling UNP used that very small reason to make it a big revenge of Sinhalese, and it was a political game which indirectly helped LTTE get attention and international support, and to insult Sinahese Buddhists and Buddhism (I guess it was a master plan of some groups of people (local and foreign), because Buddhism had started to become more popular in the world (Eg: B.R. Amedkar quit Hinduism to embrace Buddhism with 3,65,000 of his followers in 1956) and Theravada (written by Arhats) Buddhist Texts compiled in Sri Lanka, so I guess some groups needed to continue a conflict in Sri Lanka to insult Sinhalese Buddhist to insult Buddhism.).
Suresh Wanayalae:
An army captain Ravi Jayewardene (service: 1956-1966) was the son of J.R. Jayewardene (from a christian background (school) but studied Buddhism later) commanded troops during a Sinhalese-Tamils Riots in 1958 which was a continuation of 1956 riots. I guess the Christian and Ex-Christian background in Police, Army and Politicians (on the British influence) developed the conflicts (maybe to make a conflict between Sinhalese and Tamils to remove Tamil votes from the new government (MEP) elected in 1956, because they tried to change the government, and Ravi Jayewardene was sent on compulsory leave following the 1962 attempted coup. And it was a failed military coup d'état planned in Ceylon (Sri Lanka). A group of Christian officers in the military and police planned to topple the government in 1962. Organised by Deputy Commandant (Ceylon Volunteer Force), Commandant (Ceylon Volunteer Force), Rear Admiral (former Captain of the Royal Ceylon Navy), DIG (Range I), Retired DIG and Deputy Director of Land Development). Ravi Jayewardene was arrested by the police on accusations of giving weapons and jungle warfare training to youth associated with the JVP. It seems that some people wanted to develop a conflict between Sinhalese too.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prabhakaran - THUG LIFE | 5 Thug Life Incidents https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnzUoZKF6is
sudhakar:
thug life part 2 வேண்டும் என்று சொல்பவர்கள் மட்டும் like👍 போடுங்கள்
(Google Translation: Only those who say that wants thug life part 2 should like👍)
Madesh shivam (05-06-2021):
@Suresh Wanayalae karuna was a Betrayer..
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Madesh shivam , Pls read my previous comments first. Karuna said that "Prabhakaran didn't accept good political solutions, but Karuna wanted to continue peace with a political solutions during the negotiations. And that made Prabhakaran become angry with him". And it sounds like that he really didn't want to end conflicts in Sr Lanka on some reasons (Eg: on political & religious reasons.) and he enjoyed killing innocent peaple too (Eg: bus bombs), so that is why Karuna changed (maybe because most Tamils wanted peace to stop taking their small children by LTTE. But unfortunately some tamils (Eg: indian tamils, overseas tamils) didn't care about those things.).
Madesh shivam:
@Suresh Wanayalae karuna was betrayer.. He told all secrets to army and that's a reason for mullivaikkal massacre
Still now tamil persecution was continued in srilanka.. Did you accept it
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Madesh shivam, No. People like you wanted to continue fights, and some Tamils (including indian Tamils) used it as an opportunity to go to western countries. And they were just making money to enjoy while giving money to LTTE to make Sri Lankan tamils suffer more. LTTE used innocent tamils to hide behind them to prevent army attacks, and LTTE didn't allow Tamils leave those areas. But Army saved a lot of innocent Tamils from them. Few months ago a Sinhalese army major leaved a Tamil area and a lot of Tamils cried about it. You can check many things like that. Tamils need army in the tamil areas to prevent terrorism. And sometimes tamils make a lots of requests to bring Army to their areas, because Army help them in many ways. But sometimes maybe overseas Tamils and western countries listen to fake news from Tamil politicians and Tamil church and they tell government to remove army from those areas. British empire made the army in Sri Lanka and some Christian powers made some conflicts using army to separate Sinhalese Buddhists from Tamils. And they were successful. But now the army is based on Buddhist culture.
LTTE Terrorism-Church Links – Can someone explain these photos? http://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2016/09/26/ltte-terrorism-church-links-can-someone-explain-these-photos/
Reply
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lets talk about Hinduism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVnxXOyDVjo
Parveen Swami:
Sanatan is eternal which means no beginning and no ending. Can anyone tell us who wrote vedas. No one can say with authenticity. Thats why its eternal.
Suresh Wanayalae (09-06-2021):
Written Sanskrit texts are not older than 500 BCE. Hinduism is based on a lot of fake stories. There are no written texts or good evidence to prove the existence of a king called 'Rāvana' in Sri Lanka.! A lot of Hindus say "Rām Nām Sathya Hai (English: The name of Rāma is real)" at funerals, but it sounds like there was a doubt about it between some people.! There is a Buddhist story (JĀTAKA No.461) about two sons 'Rama-paṇḍita', 'Lakkhaṇa' and a daughter 'Sītā' with another son 'Bharata' from another queen of an imperial family. Hinduism and Jainism mentioned a similar but a different story about a prince called Rāma. The Buddhist story doesn't seem to belong to our human generation, and some Jātaka stories are older than an aeon (a Maha Kapla), but both Hindu and Jain stories were talking about our human generation. And if the Buddhist story is older than other stories, then that new stories sounds like indirect efforts to make the Buddha an Avatar of Vishnu, because Rama-paṇḍita was a Bodhisattva (a previous life of the Buddha), but Hindu Rāma was an Avatars of Vishnu. And the word avatar only appears in developed forms in post-Vedic literature.
Jain canonical works (oldest Jain texts) were composed around the 5th or 3rd century BCE (Eg: 'Ācārāṅga Sūtra' between 5th–4th century BCE; 'Sūtrakṛtāṅga Sūtra' between 4th-3rd century BCE;), and written almost after the enlightenment of the Buddha, but mentioned a story which was similar to the Buddhist JĀTAKA story No.461, and included Rāvaṇa into the story (maybe from Vedas) while changing 'Sītā' from sister to wife of Rāma. It sounds like some people developed a new history. Some texts of Jainism are based on Upanishads which were written in Sanskrit, but all the written Sanskrit texts are not older than 500 BCE. There are no enough details in Buddhism about Jainism to compare it with Buddhism, but Jainism has a lot of details to compare with Buddhism which sounds like that Jainism is a later development, and the name of the founder of Jainism 'Mahavira' not clearly mentioned in early Buddhist texts, but Buddhism mentioned about a group of naked monks called 'Nigaṇṭha' (Nigaṇṭha means "without knot, tie, or string"), and the founder of that group 'Nigaṇṭha Jñātaputta' who Jainism declare as 'Mahavira', but we can see a big difference between Jainism and Nigaṇṭha group. According to early Jainism "wearing of certain clothes appears to have been allowed to the weaker members of the order". But after the influence of Buddhism and other forces "they abandon the rule of nakedness and to adopt the white dress," and therefore Buddhism is older than modern Jainism, and we can't trust some historical claims about Jainism (Eg: about the life of Mahavira) which don't have references in Buddhism.
Just take your time to study more about the developments of religions.
- W.S. Madusanka
- W.S. Madusanka
Parveen Swami:
@Suresh Wanayalae I think u need to read Buddha. Dont go by the distorted texts. U need to read wt is Brahmin according to Buddha why Yagna is must.And if u dnt aware about carbon dating then u hv to read that also.
Enjoy ur ignorance. I m nt here to count ur ignorance about indic texts.
Rahul sisodia:
@Suresh Wanayalae I think you should focus on what your goals or whatever that you believe in. If Hinduism is based on fake premises then be it. Why does this matter to you? And if such problems or lies are there then why identify yourself with a Hindu Name? Change it get yourself converted or at least change your name.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Rahul sisodia , I'm a Buddhist. I think Hindus made a fake story with a fake king called Ravana in Sri Lanka, and it has a connection to Buddhism too. So, as a Sri Lankan and a Buddhist, I think I have a right to talk about that story. And according to Buddhism there are Brahma worlds (without genders, but latest hindu books made (using vedas) a female brahma as a wife of maha brahma). The meaning of my name is not a name of a hindu God. It is an Asian name to mention a supreme god (SURA + ISH) like maha brahma.
Rahul sisodia:
@Suresh Wanayalae You may call yourself Budhist or whatever the fuk. Criticising other people's religion and saying yours is the only true sounds Muslim to me. If Hinduism is false then let it be. Mind your own business.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Rahul sisodia, Wow. What an intellectual answer for people like you, but it sounds stupid to me. This argument is interesting to me, because I'm not following a belief system. And I don't care what people like you talk about Buddhism too, because I like truth more than Buddhism (Eg: expecting an afterlife is dangerous, but some Mahayana Buddhists do that to live like believers, which can become dangerous for others too.!). And I just try to reveal the truth. I don't care what you believe. Don't try to use powers to hide the truth. People like you usually try to silence other people to hide the bad side of their religion, but I'm not doing that. I was a Roman Catholic, and I didn't study Buddhism in school. And no one told me to promote Buddhism. I was following a wrong religion (Eg: I didn't know killing animals is wrong. My uncle was a Christian, and he went hunting and killed animals, but Buddhism changed him), and I think I have a right to explain why some religions are wrong, because no one belongs to a religion by birth. The direction of the world will depend on the intelligence and stupidity of humans and other living beings. If you think people are intelligent, then don't try to do stupid things to hide ideas of others to protect your religion.
Rahul sisodia:
@Suresh Wanayalae Okay preach as much as you like.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Rahul sisodia, ok bye
Rashmi Buxy (16-06-2021):
@Suresh Wanayalae that is your opinion. All religion are man made but Hinduism has beautiful analysis which no other religion can claim. Every religion or new sect are taking few drops of Hinduism and making new religion
Buddhism is a recent example, buddhist got nothing bcoz they have stolen few drop of wisdom from Hinduism and made new religion. Hinduism is a open sea of wisdom, thieves are stealing few buckets and making new river. Sea will sea always. All river and rivulets will automatically come to sea.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Rashmi Buxy, It is not an opinion, it is a clear fact that Hinduism and Jainism stolen a lot of things from Brahamanism and Buddhism. Brahamanism is based on caste system, so that is why some indians made Hinduism to challenge Buddhism. Rama and Avatars introduced later to make the Buddha an Avtar of Vishnu to help Brahamins and caste systems survive within many types of political systems in india to increase political powers etc. If you read all the Buddhist teachings (including Buddhist Abhidhamma) you can't easily compare the core teachings with Hinduism or any other religions, because Buddhism is not a belief system. So don't make lies to protect your religion. Hindu books increased powers of some Gods using vedas to make it easy to convince people to believe in something they can't explain to reduce arguments against those religions.
Suresh Wanayalae (14-08-2021):
I guess Muslims were not much worse for Hinduism, but maybe Muslims didn't support Buddhism in India while they were controlling India for around 1000 years. The Buddha didn't mention a God or an Avatar of Vishnu called Rama or Krishna. The story about Rama and Avatars developed later. I think they used the Buddhist Jataka tale number 461 to develop a story about Rama. You must try to find Hindu text about Rama and Avatars older than 500 BCE. Some Indians made a good form of Brahmanism called Hinduism to brainwash Indians to challenge Buddhism because Buddhism was a big challenge to Brahmanism. Brahmanism was a spiritually developed system, and there were many types of spiritual systems including systems of meditations to develop the mind to go to Brahma worlds, but Brahmanism had few bad sides too. According to Buddhism, there were around 62 types of beliefs (ditties) in India at the time of the Buddha. There were wandering ascetics called "Parivrajaka", and according to Buddhism some of them were just going around spirituality without reaching a destination. Therefore sometimes practicing concentration (Samatha) meditation is not enough to reach a destination. Mindfulness (Satipatthana or Vipassana) meditation is the best way to reach the destination called the state of Nirvana (enlightenment).
---------------------------------------------
Sun Tzu ✓ (YTVID: 8PxMqQh_vf4):
There is no concept of religion in ancient India, there were many practices and customs, Religion is non-Indian invention.
Shantanu Mundhe (20-08-2021):
@Suresh Wanayalae my dear friend I am neither asking for your opinions (your blogs) nor links of Ambedkarite YouTube videos(preconceived thoughts) as source. I am asking for authentic sources of information *Baudhik Scripture References*. In which scripture you read the word brahmanism?? In which book you found the reference that there are Sanskrit references for Ramayan and Mahabharat are younger than 500BCE?
It doesn’t matter what you think about relationship between Jatak Number and Ram. What matters is FACTS!!!
So talk about proper references with proper facts.
And if you want to talk about preconceived Ambedkarite ideology(planted by britishers to divide and rule India) then I am not interested in the discussion
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Shantanu Mundhe , According to Carbon dating, almost all the copies of Sanskrit scriptures are not older than 500 BCE. There are no Sanskrit scriptures older than 500BCE to provide facts about Hindu stories to prove that those stories were older than the birthdate of the Buddha. Maybe only a few parts of Vedas are older than 500 BCE, and Buddhism confirms some teachings in Vedas, but if the other scriptures are older than Buddhism we need clear facts to accept the origin of the other stories in Hinduism and Jainism if those stories were not mentioned in Buddhist scriptures or any other source. We can't find older scriptures about Rama and Avatars, and there is a big difference in the Buddhist story about Rama. And Buddhism didn't mention the word Avatar, because it was a later development of Hinduism which were used to make Vishnu powerful than Brahma to introduce Avatars to reduce the influence of caste systems in Brahamism maybe because Buddhism was a big challenge to the caste system, and there are a lot of teachings in Buddhism about the caste system of Brahmans, and Brahmans didn't have a concept of Avatars to explain about it to the Buddha.
Shantanu Mundhe:
@Suresh Wanayalae May be/I think, thats what your personal thoughts are and you are stating them as facts. Oldest reference discovered for Sanskrit is 3500BCE in Syria. You aren’t aware of this fact and you are commenting these things on Abhijit Chavda’s channel. It shows the level of your knowledge.
And why should I show the proofs?? Its you who are claiming too many things. Then it should be you only who is supposed to provide proofs/facts to strengthen your claims, isn’t it??
Nobody denies that there were some serious problems in Hindu Society in last couple of centuries. But that doesn’t mean you can say anything about it without any basis to your thoughts.
‘Brahmanism’ have you ever read this term in Sanskrit scriptures??? (In fact I should ask have you studied any scripture at all😂😂?? let it be Hindu Scripture or Baudh Scripture.)
You won’t because it is invented by western historians. To manipulate minds like you.
After this I won’t be replying to any of your comments. Coz I don’t think we can have a productive discussion with you only pushing forward you personal opinion based on things that you heard in some YouTube videos and blogs you read from some western historians.
Peace out.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Shantanu Mundhe , I didn't say that Sanskrit is not older than 500 BCE. I was talking about Hinduism, and I didn't say there was a religion called Brahmanism, but there were a group of people called Brahmins. And they were teaching their dharma. There are very old Buddhist monuments in India more than old Hindu monuments. And there were a lot of Buddhist universities too. I don't know whether Hindu universities existed or not. However, I have a clear explanation about the origin of elementary particles which agrees with the Buddhist teachings as well. I have explained about it with videos etc. And according to that theory we don't need a creator God to create the Universe.
Shantanu Mundhe:
@Suresh Wanayalae you don’t know whether there were any Universities following Sanatan Dharma or not🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 dude you are so funny
Think about your existence…
You and all Ambedkarite historians live only to cancel Sanatan Dharma.. thats the only purpose of your life..
log janm lete hai kuch bada kam krne ke liye.. lekin tum jese logo ke wichar dekh ke bohot bura lagta hai.. kay purpose hai tumhare life ka??? Bas har jagah pe Cancel Cancel Cancel😂😂😂
I pity you.
(Btw I agree with everything you said…
You are absolutely correct.. that’s what you want to read na??😄😄 have fun.. karlo duniya mutthi me)
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Shantanu Mundhe , You are crazy. Nalanda Buddhist university is the oldest well-known university in the world. Just keep your jokes with you. I converted from Roman Catholic to Buddhism. You should read everything I mentioned carefully. I made the theory of everything. And that theory proves how the universe originated mathematically, so Hinduism and Abrahamic religions must be wrong about the creator God. You were just wasting my time. I don't think you will investigate those things. Bye
Swanton Bomb (25-09-2021):
@Suresh Wanayalae what about takshashila university which was founded in 1000 bc
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Swanton Bomb , That university was not a religious university as the Nalanda University, and there were Buddhist students and professors as well. However, Hinduism developed after 500BCE to challenge Buddhism because Brahmanism couldn't survive without making Hinduism. They used stories about Krishna and Rama to challenge Brahmanism within Hinduism. And that modern Hinduism created a wife for Brahama (maybe to justify brahmins marrying beautiful girls, but real Brahma worlds don't have female Brahma beings.), and made Vishnu more powerful than Brahama.
Pratik Bhale:
@Suresh Wanayalae lol convert stop spreading hate ..
First research and then comment
There no such thing as Brahmanism
In Hinduism it is made up thing by so called dr baba for propoganda.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Pratik Bhale , You should know the history first. Hinduism is a development of Brahmanism even they didn't call it Brahmanism. But Brahmanism is the Vedas of Brahmans. Vishnu Purana and Mahabharat stories developed later to create Hinduism. You can't find a Hindu religion in the early caste system of Brahmins. That caste system is a system of hate, and if you like the caste system you should try to identify yourself as a lower caste person first to feel the fun of that hate system. And some Brahmins run their family with the help of their caste system because they are using it as a privilege to do religious activities for others. There were around 62 types of faiths in India at the time of the Buddha. A lot of Indians still believe a lot of things, and modern Hinduism is just a fruit salad of many spiritual systems. And sometimes they misguide people who want to know about Buddhism saying that Buddhism is a part of Hinduism. But it is a big lie and big propaganda against Buddhism.
---------------------------------------------
Science Journey Exposed - Who was Lord Buddha l Buddhism#buddhism#lordbuddha#hinduism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BruFAkiVrJU
Suresh Wanayalae (08-01-2022):
The early life of Dr. Ambedkar was horrible because of the caste system in India. But higher caste Hindus ignore it or try to make better interpretations about it.
REVIEW FACTS:
When u don't know what is cast and what is varna so stop making nonsense comments on it अंबेडकर hinself was defficient in संस्कृत language he already admitted that in his own book WHO WERE SHUDRA ok I myself shudra I m not bhrahmin ok buddhism small branch of hinduism all the cults came after महाभारत वॉ happened there is no evidence of Islam, Christ, buddhism, jainism, any other civilisation before mahabhrat war only hindus are oldest civilisation and it is based on knowledge ok अंबेडकर was illiteat in scriptures then how can someone who is illitreat in scripture judges 😅😅😂😂
Suresh Wanayalae:
@REVIEW FACTS, Your interpretation of the caste system doesn't change the caste system. The discrimination in the Indian caste system is a well-known fact. Don't behave like a baby. Brahmanism is based on the caste system & animal sacrifices etc. Hinduism and Jainism are later developments of Brahmanism and Buddhism. Sanskrit texts were developed after 500 BCE & increased the powers of some Gods to help Brahmins and caste systems survive. And used JĀTAKA #461 for it. Rama-paṇḍita was a Bodhisattva (a previous life of the Buddha), but Hindu Rāma was an Avatars of Vishnu. Avatars appear in post-Vedic literature & included Rāvaṇa while changing 'Sītā' from sister to wife of Rāma. Upanishads is in Sanskrit, but texts are not older than 500 BCE. I know that early Vedas were very primitive. But there were very good meditators in India for sure. And most of them didn't represent caste systems. There were around 62 religions/views at the time of the Buddha. Brahmanism was one of them. The followers of Vedas tried their best to make Brahamanism better or change the bad ideas in Brahmanism using new stories about Rama and Khrishna to make a better religion (Hindusim) to challenge Buddhism.
-------------------
Alok Sahu:
@Suresh Wanayalae did you even know what you write. You said original ram & Sita were actually sisters. So you want to say Budhists used to marry with their sisters Lol..........yehi hota hai jab aap dusre par ungli uthate ho to 4 ungli aap ki aur uthiti hai. There is no Ravan in Dasrath jatak. And again here you are contradicting Ambedkar himself. Ambedkar said that it was Budhists that were beef eaters & Brahmins are vegetarians. And Brahmins forced their vegetarianism on Budhists which resulted in untouchble castes. So you are contradicting Ambedkar himself. This thing is supported by Budha himself who died because of Food poisoning caused due to overeating pork. So the point of Budhism & Jainism being revolted against Brahmins was himself contradicted by ambedkar himself.
Alok Sahu:
The caste of Ambedkar Mahars themselves perform untouchability with the lower caste mangs. That's why LC mangs always opposed Ambedkar.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Alok Sahu , In the Buddhist Jathaka tale Rama-Panditha and Sita were not married and they didn't marry. Mahabarat and Jainism used and changed the Buddhist Jathaka tale. And then Valmiki wrote ramajana with many years later with more details. According to Buddhism it is not a 5000 years old story. But indian scammers made it around 5000 years older around 2700 years later. Caste system, animal sacrifices, sati puja, and useless pujas were/are not good practices. But people like you try to maintain them to protect their cultural ignorence.
Alok Sahu:
@Suresh Wanayalae in the dasrath jatak it is clearly written that budha was Ram & Sita was yosadhara. And it is a fact that they were husband & wife. In Vesantar jatak it is clearly written that Ram & Sita were husband & wife. Budhghosh in his commentry also said the same thing That They were brothers & sister and later married. Ambedkar Himself said that Ram & Sita were brothers & sisters in Riddle of Ram. Revesre castism,human cannibalism,animal eating and other useless Budhists rituals were not good practice but people like you want to mentined it.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Alok Sahu , No they were not husband and wife at that time. That is a nature a group rebiths. Sometime friend become brothers. Wife become sister too.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Alok Sahu , Buddhagosha was an indian. Read the real/original story first. I'm busy. Bye
Alok Sahu:
@Suresh Wanayalae Budhghosh was a great Budhist author. No one can rejected his Att Kathas while studying Budhism. Even Indic Budhist scholors like bhadat Anand & Rahul sanskreyauan many times quoted him their pali canon translation.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Alok Sahu , Yes I know that, but he didn't write the Thripitaka and Jataka tales.
Alok Sahu:
@Suresh Wanayalae but his Atkathas are important to understand it. The Vesantar jatak himself accepted it that Ram & Sita were husband wife
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Alok Sahu , No. Only the original texts matter. I don't know what you are talking. I don't think that Buddhagosha thero said something like that. However. he may have read hindu books too. So I don't care about his idea about that.
Alok Sahu:
@Suresh Wanayalae ohh... where did the main texts said that Ramayan was copied by Dasrath jatak.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Alok Sahu , Avatars are later development of Hinduism. Ramayana seems like a try to make Buddha an Avatar of Vishnu, and a try to make a Fake story about india.
Alok Sahu:
@Suresh Wanayalae how Ramayan can try to make budha as a avtar of Vishnu. It is the story of Ram not budha. Even Budhists believe in the concept of Avtarvad.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Alok Sahu , Don't lie. Buddhism never talked about Avatars. Making Rama an Avatar of Vishnu indirectly makes Buddha an Avatar of Vishnu because Rama-Panditha was a past life of Buddha (Bodhisatva). Don't try to show your ignorence to me. Talk about origninal sources. But I don't like to argue with ignorent people.
Alok Sahu:
@Suresh Wanayalae why lie??If Budhists don't believe in Avtarvad than please explain the concept of 28 Budhas. Even Dalai Lama was considered as Avatar of Budha.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Alok Sahu , The 28 Buddhas were the Buddhas the Bodhisathwa met when. Don't show your ignorence. Rebirth is not an Avatar. Maybe you are crazy too. I don't have time to teach Buddhism. You are talking rubbish. And try to change the truth as Hinduism and Abrahamic religions did. Bye
Alok Sahu:
@Suresh Wanayalae In mahayan Budhism they are considered as incarnations of Avloketswara himself. They even believe the concept of Iswar to. I don't need the explanation of Budhism. I'm stating what Budhists believe themselves. Say that we do not believe in Neo-Buddhist incarnation, do not cast your ideology on other Buddhist communities.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Alok Sahu , Incarnation is not an Avatar. Mahayana Buddhism is mixed with Hinduism too. It is not the early Buddhism. And they have their own worships and teachers too. Don't try to mix the original teaching with later developments, as most Hindus do with Hinduism. People like you are sick. I'm talking about the original text.
Alok Sahu:
@Suresh Wanayalae Avtar ko hi English mein incarnation bolte hai. And again I'm not here to react who is pure Budhist or who is not??I had made my point that mahayanis believe in Avtarvad which you accepted. Yes in original Hinduism in vedic philosophy the concept of Avatar don't exist. Same logic applied for Budhism to.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@Alok Sahu , An Avatar is two or more existence at once. I didn't accept that Avatars exist n Mayahana Buddhism. You are just wasting my time with your fake interpretations. Mahayana Buddhism was influenced By indian culture. If you don't want to know the truth. It is fine. You can follow any new concept if you don't care about the original early teachings. It is difficult to remove the stupidy from some people who lived with a lot of people like that.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
🎯127 | कौन पुराना : संस्कृत या पाली ? | Pali Sanskrit की DNA रिपोर्ट, Evolution of Language & Script
How Old is Written Sanskrit?
Yannis X'Markou:
As a Greek, I learned a lot from you about these other languages, and cultures, your presentation was very good. Thank you
Suresh Wanayalaege:
Buddhism is older than modern Hinduism. The characteristics of the old Sanskrit language that was used to write Rig Veda don't make Rig Veda an old text because the written texts of Rig Veda that currently exist are not older than early Buddhist texts. Those who wrote the old oral Rig Veda into texts could easily add new knowledge and make the structure of the texts match existing knowledge and writing technics. Also, the language that was used to write Upanishad doesn't make Upanishad old because there are no old written texts of the Upanishad older than early Buddhism. Modern Hinduism is a later development that was used to manipulate the existing knowledge of those times, and it is not older than Buddhism. Perhaps, the invasion of the south Indian Kalinga kingdom by the north Indian king Ashok made south India work against the dynasty of king Ashok and the influence to spread the north Indian Buddhism in India, leading to the writing of a lot of modern Hindu text inside south India to use them to separate south India (Kollywood) from north India (Bollywood) and Buddhism. Thank you.
Krishna's musical vlogs:
My grandmother used to say that one should get proper education. I think her words were damn true. I haven't understood why you used bollywood and kollywood. And more over chola inscriptions clearly mentioned about Buddhism and its wise nature. In fact cholas themselves contributed somuch to the Buddhism and the monks following it. Its during chola period, buddhism got much spread to east. And for your kind information, ankor wat temple was build by the cholan descendent suryavarman 11, the then king of khmer. Better study indian history properly and then comment here. Coming to texts, people like you will see spots for creating conflicts. if south indians created updated hindu texts, then why same gayatri mantri was resided in the holy adobe of both badrinath in north and rameshwarm in south. Why same samaveda resided at kedarnath and amarnath temples and tirupati balaji temple. Why there is same ramayana and mahabharatha....why there is same anthyopachaaraas made to gods after every ritual. Thats why aadi sankaracharya roamed all over india and placed four peetas in for directions of our country and educated about the one ness and uniqueness of our holy country.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Krishna's musical vlogs, The most bloody battle recorded during King Ashok's period was Kalinga Battle. According to history, King Ashok was disappointed about the deaths he caused, and he saw a very calm Buddhist monk walking around there, in or around Kalinga, causing him to convert to Buddhism. South India has Buddhist history, and King Ashok didn't (or couldn't) invade the Chola Kindom in south India. Kalinga kingdom was re-established after the death of king Ashok. Perhaps, the heat of the war could cause rejection of the influence of the Ashoka empire in Kalinga, including Buddhism. The influence of language similarity between Kalinga and other south Indian Kingdoms could cause south Indians to share and fill the hate against King Ashoka and his establishment of Buddhism in India. Sri Lankan Sinhalese Buddhists can easily understand it because some people tried to make conflicts between Tamils and Sinhalese in Sri Lanka, and used those conflicts to remove Buddhist culture from the northeastern province of Sri Lanka with the help of some Christian leaders. Also, they tried/try to use those conflicts to insult Buddhism. Likely, there is a strong Hindu tradition in south India than in north India. Sometimes, hate and political reasons make religions against other nations. Likely, some Indians copied the Buddhist tale about Rama-Panditha to make modern Hinduism. So, as a Buddhist reject the changed story about Rama mentioned in modern Hindu books. South Indians could easily know about the islands (Bridge) between early Sri Lanka and India, and they could name it Rama Setu (Rama Bridge) with their new story about Rama and Ravana. If ignorant historians or fictional story writers wrote a story about a flood (Nova's flood), using remnants of a ship that was made to prepare for such a flood, then their texts about the history don't represent a real historical flood. The Hindu story about Rama and Ravana doesn't make sense, and winning against early Sri Lanka is not a big thing because Sri Lanka is a very small country. Most likely, the Valmiki's Ramayana texts were developed later with the development of modern Hinduism.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Krishna's musical vlogs, Likely, most western countries (Christian powers) try to use the United Nations human rights council to continue and popularize a conflict between Sri Lankan Buddhists (Sinhalese) and Tamils because they are afraid of the influence of Sinhalese Buddhists (Sri Lankans) to spread Theravada Buddhism (Original Buddhism) around the world, and they want to reduce that influence, insulting Sri Lanka (Buddhists). Likely, they only listen to the Christian church, and they can't see the human rights violations of the Christian Prabhakaran. They forgot the human rights violations they continued for hundreds of years to spread their religion and fight with the followers of Allah. I personally like to recommend that they should remove their clothes and be naked if they really don't shy to forget and ignore their human rights violations.
Pranav W:
@Prince Dara Shikoh you should know if talk about education.
That the indus valley had its own script.
The Buddhists had pali prakit.
How is it that somehow only the middle ones bramhins did not develop a script.???????
Because it did not exist at that time.
Check any version of vedas.
No matter how old. The oldest you would find is in devnagri.
Which is hardly 700 years old.
Stop trying to save bramhanical system. It is , was and always will be an oppressive system.
Which is just breathing its last.
Pranav W:
@Prince Dara Shikoh Yeah. You seem to be ignorant enough to beleive anything without evidence.
Try finding out yourself.
Evidence of vedic age?
They say pots.
Well pots were being made even in indus valley.
If you need to learn.
There are some books.
" Itihaas ka muayena " - rajendra prasad singh.
" Vedic kaal ka ghaalmel " - surendra agyat.
Read a bit. Dont blindly believe something served to you.
Prince Dara Shikoh:
@UCCr6of0pWVKVF7tLXI9J7ug I'm Atheist but influenced by Buddhism. But you don't have any understanding of indian history. Read history books of prominent historians of india like romila thapar
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Prince Dara Shikoh , Show me written texts older than 400 BCE to prove me that Modern Hinduism didn't copy from Buddhism. I was talking about evidence, about interpretations. Try to study scientific methods to prove the history using facts. You can't show me a statue of Rama or Khrishna older than Buddhism. The evidence shows the existence of Buddhism all around India before the rise of modern Hinduism. And some Hindus tried to change those statues and tried to make wrong interpretations sometimes. The Buddhist text contain a lot of information about a lot of religions in India. The Buddha and Buddhists argued with Brahamanins who studied Vedic texts, but they didn't discuss names of the modern Hindu Gods Rama and Khrishna, and other Avatars, including word Avatar itself.
ධම්මවිජය ස්වාමීන් වහන්සේ ජාතිවාදියෙක් ? | Arun Siddarth
