Dark Matter is just use a different dimension, as same as a Block Hole. But the dimensions of the Black Holes and Dark Marter are different. Ordinary matter use a different dimension, and Dark Energy use a different dimension too. Everything is moving towards the forth dimension which we call the time. The interaction between main three dimensions and the 'time dimension' is called the energy. - Suresh. I have explained how dimensions can make those different types of forms:
Something can come from nothing and infinity of directions. Watch this video completely to learn how it is possible Mathematically: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxxQfSqXDbI
We can write the main 6 directions like this without using a distance (during the Start of the Universe):
(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)
And we can write it like this too: (+0-0)6
There is a mathematical formula like this:
(+a-b)2 = a2 - 2ab + b2
We can write it like this too: a2 - (+1-(-1)) x a x b + b2
And if the a = 0 and b = 0, then we can write it the mathematical formula like this:
(+0-0)2 = 02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 02
You can see how (+0-0)2 made this (+1-(-1)) distance between 0 and 0 x 0 (between Zero (0) and 0.0 or Null (.)).
If we apply that mathematical formula to this (+0-0)6 then we can get the following results:
(+0-0)6 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+0-0)6
(+0-0)6 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
(+1-(-1))3 =
(+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1)
- ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)
(Eg: (+1) x (+1) x (+1) = (+1)3)
(+1-(-1))3 =
A: (+1)3
B: (+1)3 x (-1)
C: ((-1)2 x (+1)2)
D: (-1)2 x (+1)
E: ((+1)2 x (-1)
F: ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: ((-1)3 x (+1))
H: (-1)3
The 8 main formations in the Universe which made 4D, 3D, 2D and 1D objects like Galaxies, Atoms, Magnetic fields, Solar Systems, Waves like Light and heat and etc after the formation of this +1-(-1))3 obect in the Universe which forms with the every start and restart of the Universe, which formed from 6 Directions with (+0-0)6 zeros between (+0.0-0.0)3 at the edge of the Universe which still form small forms like Space and Energy using dimensions at the edge of the Universe with the expansion of the Universe.
@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@
Abdullah Sameer:
If you like this video, you can download a copy here: http://bit.ly/2Liagk8
Fire Starter:
I love you and your videos Abdullah Sameer for the sake of Allah π who may or may not exist. Just wanted to let you know you’ve given my life a lot of clarity and I’m at a point were I’m not living in fear but living my best life. A year ago I used to get mad at your videos because you made a lot of sense but I didn’t want anymore fuel for my slow progression to disbelief. Now I look forward to them! I’m a proud closeted exmuslim. Sending you and your family love and light - Your Somali Sister
Abdullah Sameer:
Can I share this on twitter/fb?
Fire Starter:
Yes please feel free to!
Somali Woman:
I am a Somali ex Muslim, unfortunately the religion has taken over my entire country, every single Somali woman walking the streets is covered from head to toe, there is no freedom of religion, meaning that Somali Christians, Atheists will be prosecuted. Thank you Abdullah for all that you do, videos like yours would have angered me 2 years ago, now I see my mother living in constant fear, praying multiple times a day, always begging Allah to save her from hell.I don't have to live in fear anymore.
Fire Starter:
kate adam I see a lot of young Somali’s turning away from the faith but they have to be closeted because it risks everything. But it’s nice to see another Somali gaal lol
nujuum Arts:
I also begin to have more doubts lately but felt bit careless and free
Suresh Madusanka:
A Powerful Creator God does not exist to send mad Islamic Murderers to heaven. Some selfish groups use a name of a God to get forgiveness, and to remove their fear about going to Hell. It is a cheating, and they are ignoring their own feelings about good and bad. Impermanent Gods like Brahmas and Devas can exist (Eg: Great Brahma, Maithreya (Next Buddha), Devendra, Jesus. Great Brahma is not a creator God: https://www.accesstoinsight.org/ptf/dhamma/sagga/loka.html). A creator God doesn't exist to create some animals for humans to eat, and that is why the nature of our happy feelings in our mind and body quickly vanish or reduce when we harm and kill or thinking about harming and killing animals. And most animals feel the same, so if a God created our feelings then he will not tell us to ignore it. The Buddha said a lot of things about Hells (Eg: hell beings, animals, ghosts) and Karma to make a fear about it to prevent harming and killing good people for any reason. Both Roman and Arabic empires used a Man and a God to make a book to control people. The bible couldn't prove an existence of a creator God, but the writers of the Quran specially tried to use their knowledge to prove it. Muslim men like to believe Quran because of a lot of Sex and fun for Muslim men in Islam.
A lot of Muslims reject evolution shamelessly, but they try to relate modern science with irrelevent and small verses in Quran to prove an existence of a God. An evolution of the Universe is possible from a cyclic process of the 4 Dimensions (including time) between the 6 Directions. Muslims try to emphasize that a nice world for humans can't exist without a creator God, and Muslims completely ignore the SUFFERING and HELPLESS existence of other living beings. And they make the worlds of animals horrible. Small Muslim children kill animals because of the Quran, and it destroys the kindness in Muslim children. Killing animals is a SIN in some major religions, so the Muslim children are victims of Islam, and it can make them mad. Humans should control the Muslim mad Dogs as same as we control animals.
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can change this for me." - Albert Einstein
Islam teach Muslims how to kill animals, but sometimes it is a training to kill humans. So be aware about the things Muslims tell you about Islam and other religions.
A lot of Islamic preachers earn money and wives. We must let Ex-Muslims talk about Islam to help good Muslim humans to be open-minded to make them advice bad Muslims about fabrications in Islam to prevent bad Muslims being extremists and terrorists with wrong details and fabrications about Science, Human's rights, Women's rights, Animal's rights, Non-Muslim's rights, Ex-Muslim's rights, Rights to learn, Rights to talk, Religious Freedom in Islam. Islam violate a lot of rights, but it entertains the Muslim men.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Japanese Think of Religions (Interview): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gZHuFtuzdg&lc=z23czloohqumzdknwacdp434z0jua0cp12ow4zw5sjhw03c010c.1582759039176322
Norman Milroy (Suresh Madusanka):
Atoms, Solar Systems, Black Holes And Galaxies In Buddhism:
"As for the smaller measurements, there are seven dust motes in a mote of airborne dust, seven motes of airborne dust in a rabbit hair, seven rabbit hairs in a sheep hair, seven sheep hairs in a cow hair, seven cow hairs in a gnat, seven gnats in a louse egg, seven lice eggs in a mustard seed, seven mustard seeds in a barley grain, and seven barley grains in a fingertip. Thus, there are nearly two billion dust motes in a fingertip."
(Buddhist Sutta: The Lankavatara Sutra:https://books.google.lk/books?id=OGw7rcVzC1EC Page 56 to 57)
The Shape Of The Earth In Buddhism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxxQfSqXDbI
Flat earth in Islam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrUlO7VLaIE
Flat earth in Bible (including Hebrew Bible): https://www.lockhaven.edu/~dsimanek/febible.htm
"Between every three world systems there is one world interval, which is like the space in the middle of three cart wheels or petals placed so that they touch one another. This world-interval hell (lokahtafikanirayo) measures eight thousand yojanas in size.'"(Anguttara Nikaya 819)
(*It sounds like that there are minimum 3 Habitable Solar Systems in a Galaxy around a Black Hole)
According to Buddhism "There are 3 Habitable World Systems around a WORLD INTERVAL (Black Hole)". But there can be more Solar Systems around a Black Hole (inside a Galaxy) which are not habitabe. "A thousandfold minor world system (Galaxy) can have around 1000 habitable World Systems" too. Siemensbot:
Just shut up. It doesn't even make any sense. That doesn't make it right. There is no higher power in buddhism thats why you can tell us as much as you want about scientific "miracles" and it wouldn't change anything. Where would someone get his knowledge from?
Norman Milroy (Suresh Madusanka):
@Siemensbot , What is the source of God? ππ I know your answer. Your man made 'definition of God' is your source of your God. ππ
Infinity And Directions Can Make Dimensions Called The Universe. So You Don't Need A Creator God.
Dark Matter just use a different dimension, as same as a Block Hole. But the dimensions of the Black Holes and Dark Marter are different. Ordinary matter use a different dimension, and Dark Energy use a different dimension too. Everything is moving towards the forth dimension which we call the time. The interaction between main three dimensions and the 'time dimension' is called the energy. - Suresh. I have explained how dimensions can make those different types of forms:
Something can come from nothing and infinity of directions. Watch this video completely to learn how it is possible Mathematically: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxxQfSqXDbI
The Universe is not only nothing, but also infinite. Nothing and ( x ) infinity create ( = ) forms of +emptiness and -emptiness in between, and the infinity continue that process at the edge of the emptiness (distance) too. 'Nothing' becomes' +Emptiness and -Emptiness when 'Infinity of the 6 directions ((+0-0)6 or (+0.0-0.0)3)' overlap with each other making 4 dimensions inside 3 dimensions which make Time and Distance. And the Universe always has 6 directions (Up,Down,Left,Right,Front,Back) with those nothingness and infinity. Big Bangs and Dark Energy restart and increase the capacity of the Universe (*mathematically: +0-0 to +1,-1 and +0.001,-0.001). If the edge of the Universe is expanding, then we can understand that the edge of the Universe can make space or energy from nothing and infinity (mathematically). We already discovered that an energy called Dark Energy cause to an accelarating expansion of the Universe (including galaxies). So the Dark Energy is the evidence which showed us that it can come from nothing and infinity of directions around the Universe. Dark energy is not static. So the speed of the acceleration of the galaxies will cause to collapse the forms like Galaxies, Dark Matter, Atoms and etc. And then it can cause to make a Big Bang again.
Mathematically: (+0-0)6 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
So,
(+1-(-1))3 made space, galaxies, atoms and etc.
And,
(+0.0-0.0)3 is making space or energy at the edge of the Universe.
Does A Creator God Exist? - Answered: https://buddhist-essentials-and-concepts.blogspot.com/p/does-creator-god-exist-answered.html
Don't try to make a God from nothing. If you think humans or someone else made mathematics, then you are not intelligent enough to continue this discussion.
Siemensbot:
@Norman Milroy First of all I don't waste my time reading so long texts. Why should I even care if Buddhism is the truth or not. It doesn't give me any disadvantages. It can't be the truth. Why should the truth be only in asia? Doesn't make any sense. The believe in God is everywhere on this planet.
Norman Milroy (Suresh Madusanka):
@Siemensbot , If you are sure about your afterlife, then maybe you don't need Buddhism. But now Rebirth is a scientific fact: http://buddhist-essentials-and-concepts.blogspot.com/p/proof-of-existance-of-after-life.html. So if you want to stop rebirth you should practice this: Satipatthana Sutta read by Sally Clough (English) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zUCcu-NXF0 Buddhism was a world religion: Afghanistan-Pre-Islamic Era: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMm9zCh_BxI And still Buddhism is the OLDEST well organised (established) major religion on the earth. Other major religions organised (established) later with new books.
----------------------------------------------------------
What Japanese Girls Think of Christianity and Dating Christians (Interview): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YR9Pc1HQPBE
Joshua Johnston:
@Norman Milroy There have been many man made gods and versions of God made to fit man's standards, but the God of the Bible is the absolute least likely to be man made. He is the only deity to have a clear, moral law for men to follow. Furthermore, God's law and standard often is opposite of what men actually desire to do. When men create gods, they are often arbitrary or have no moral law. Why great a fake deity and the force yourself to meet its standard, even though it's not what you naturally want? Makes no sense. The writers of the Bible as well were convinced that God was real, and feared and obeyed Him. They didn't design him. It should be clear as day, studying history and the human condition, that men didn't design this God.
Also, the flat earth thing is crap, and the Bible doesn't say anything about the earth being flat. It's only dumbasses that misinterpret words like "corners of the earth" who think it says that.
Norman Milroy (Suresh Madusanka):
@Joshua Johnston , Do you know that Infinity And Directions Can Make Dimensions Called The Universe. So You Don't Need A Creator God.
Does A Creator God Exist? - Answered: https://buddhist-essentials-and-concepts.blogspot.com/p/does-creator-god-exist-answered.html
Don't try to make a God from nothing. If you think humans or someone else made mathematics, then you are not intelligent enough.
Jesus was a Buddhist Monk BBC Documentary http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsN4zE2yilo
Someone gave a drink to jesus before he die (maybe to make him look like dead.). Usually people take a long time to die on a Cross, But the Jesus (a powerful person) died in 6 or 9 hours. So it is funny. Joseph of Arimathea arranged a special place to keep the dead body of jesus. It seems that Jesus didn't die on the cross. Because Jesus appeared to many people around 200 to 500 times while he was leaving the Israel. You can't find any detail about Jesus from the age 13 to 30. So maybe he travelled to asia, and then he could practice meditation as a Buddhist monk, which gave him some supernatural powers. However, the other proofs showed that he returned to Kashmir (Yuz Asaf (meaning “Leader of the Healed”/"Son of Joseph") http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_in_Ahmadiyya_Islam). So learn about it more.
Joseph was a relative of Jesus; specifically, Mary's uncle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_of_Arimathea
Joshua Johnston:
@Norman Milroy You try to come off as scientific, but insist on speculation over the accounts we have. Nowhere has anyone said Jesus went to Asia or became a Buddhist. The idea is preposterous and has no evidence. He taught from the Torah.
You come off like someone who hasn't even read the gospels. You claim it would have taken longer for him to die. False. It takes 5-20 hrs to die on a cross, and 9 hrs lies in between that. You fail to recall that Jesus was scourged brutally, having been given a beating that would kill some men. This was BEFORE he went to the cross. You come up with some wacky speculation about someone giving some elixir to him that makes him appear dead. Don't you realize it was a Roman soldier who gave him the vinegar to drink? What reason would a Roman soldier have to fake his death? Furthermore you fail to recall the accounts that Jesus was skewered through the side with a spear, to make sure he was dead. The accounts are clear that He died, yet you don't want to believe the accounts, instead you'd rather rely on speculation. I'm a man of reason and science, so I'll take the accounts over some hair brained speculations.
You've got the universe all figured out havent you? A universe that just created itself for no rhyme or reason. Doesn't explain morals, doesn't explain meaning, and who knows, maybe you believe that there are no objective morals or meaning. Of course that's what you should believe, to be intellectually honest....but your whole post is anything but intellectually honest.
Norman Milroy (Suresh Madusanka):
@Joshua Johnston , Romans almost didn't want to kill Jesus, but some Jews wanted to kill Jesus. Joseph of Arimathea was a rich man, and maybe he tried to protect jesus with the help of the Romans. I was a Roman Catholic, so I know about the Bible. However, watch the BBC documentry to know about the evidence they have about the life of the Jesus. However, I don't like to waste your time, because Christianity is not a big problem to the world. But Islam use a name of a God to destroy human rights and etc.
I could figure out about the existence of the Universe mathematically. It just increases the capacity of it with the cyclic process caused by directions and infinity. There are suffering in this Universe than Happiness (Most animals/ hell beings suffer a lot.), and the Universe don't care about it. I don't have time to explain more about it to you.
"Dark Energy cause to an accelarating expansion of the Universe (including galaxies). So the Dark Energy is the evidence which showed us that it can come nothing and infinity of directions around the Universe", because real mathematics can show that (+0.0-0.0)3 is able to create +0.001 and -0.001, as well as (+0-0)2 is able to create +1 and -1. But our common knowledge about mathematics don't help us to make that calculation, because if we use a normal calculator to multiply 0 from a 0 then the result it shows is 0 ( wrong mathematics: 0x0 = 0), but in the reality if we multiply 0 from a 0 (mathematically: 0x0), then the result should be 0.0 (mathematically: 0x0 = 0.0). There is a big difference between 0 and 0.0 (Null). Real mathematics can show how forms can come from nothing (without a distance (0 distance = +0-0)) and from the infinity of the 6 directions.
Morality is very simple:
1.) Treat others as you want them to treat you.
2.) Try not to harm yourself, try not to harm others.
According to causes and effects, harming others can harm yourself too, because your bad actions can give bad results to you too. It is a science of the body and mind.
Not only materials follow the rule called causes and effects, but also our mind follows it too. So if something survives after the death, then our Karma (action) of the mind will react to it.
Rebirth is the problem. Buddhism is the solution.
Is There Life after Death? Fifty Years of Research at UVA: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AtTM9hgCDw
Near-Death Experiences – Academic Publications: https://med.virginia.edu/perceptual-studies/publications/academic-publications/near-death-experiences-academic-publications/
Proofs of existance of the afterlife: http://buddhist-essentials-and-concepts.blogspot.com/p/proof-of-existance-of-after-life.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agnostic Muslim asks Zakir Naik "Isn't religion used to control people?": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOtUelBT4rQ
Pin Apple:
even if god exists, he isn't worthy of being worshipped
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Pin Apple Yes. That so-called God can't be better than the Universe, because the cyclic process of the Universe let us start again from the beginning if we were wrong, but that so-called God send some people to an eternal hell.
Pin Apple:
@Suresh Wanayalaege any proof of ur claims sir?? really any proof at all... apart frm religious books???uk...i can't expect u to believe in a green blob in d room juss bcoz i want u to....give lectures on God only if u hv any claims supporting it
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Pin Apple I didn't say that a creator God exists. I'm a Buddhist atheist. I meant IF there is a creator God, he is not a Good God, because he send people to an eternal hell.
Timothy Mostad:
@Suresh Wanayalaege
Theists can't or refuse to understand that uninformed people created the gods.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Timothy Mostad , Maybe most of them don't understand it. But when they find an alternative knowledge, then some of them can understand it.
Timothy Mostad:
@Suresh Wanayalaege
To be an antiquated fictional fantasy after reading the whole book, cover to cover.
Muslims are like other cults, never read/understand while they are telling other people it is true, and take other person's word for it instead of finding out for themselves.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Timothy Mostad , Yes. And Muslims can't Question Islam publicly without risking his/her life. Why I Don't Debate Muslim Apologists - Apostate Prophet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQiOiIAnMo8
JDR 353:
Great video sameer..ππ
Islam and Allah is indeed sexual excuse for one man Muhammad ππ©
JOJO FreelancerKUP:
Read the old testament first. Than all those abrahamic faiths collapse.
JDR 353:
@JOJO FreelancerKUP
Read Genesis 19
And Quran 54 : 34
You will know
Which is truth when you see todays Sodom and gomorrah.....π€ͺπ
Hasanul S:
@JOJO FreelancerKUP OT doesn't support pedophilia, war or sexual perversion. Indeed those who were sexually perverted were punished by the Lord.
JOJO FreelancerKUP:
@JDR 353 today sodom and gomora? Learn your history.
JOJO FreelancerKUP:
@Hasanul S https://www.therichest.com/shocking/15-naughty-verses-you-wont-believe-came-from-the-bible/
JDR 353:
@JOJO FreelancerKUP
Hey go and see for Sodom and gomorrah filled with brimstone and sulphur
Not storm of stones
Since Allah doesn't even know what's in Sodom and gomorrah....π€ͺπ€ͺ
JOJO FreelancerKUP:
@JDR 353 https://youtu.be/5YPVtSaqwi4
JDR 353:
@Suresh Wanayalaege
Lord Jesus Christ said
Matthew 16 : 23
Get behind me satan for you dont have any eternal concerns but merely Himan concerns...
Stupid boy ....
Dont Mock yourself
JOJO FreelancerKUP:
@Suresh Wanayalaege https://youtu.be/5YPVtSaqwi4
JOJO FreelancerKUP:
@Suresh Wanayalaege Are you Buddhist? Budhism makes more scence than Christianity
fish you:
@JOJO FreelancerKUP buddhism makes sense???u need a doctor ππ
JOJO FreelancerKUP:
@fish you It makes much more sence than a god who sacrafices himself for himself to save humanity from himself. πππππππππππππππ
US MOOSLIMS IS SPESHUL PEEPLES US NEEDS RESPECKT:
@fish you Buddhism makes 10000 times sense than Abrahamic religions
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@JOJO FreelancerKUP , Thank you.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@JOJO FreelancerKUP , Yes, I'm a Buddhist. I converted from Roman Catholic when I was around 11 years old.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@fish you , This is the most important thing you should know in Buddhism: Satipatthana Sutta (shortly) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zUCcu-NXF0
Satipatthana sutta (Fully) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zM0ZF3zEcd8
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@JDR 353 , I know that the so-called creator God is dangerous. He tells us to accept him or burn in hell forever. He is just like a leader of a Mafia gang. If you want to go to heaven then you should practice your mind to do it. Believing heaven and heavenly beings is a part of Buddhist practice too. Maybe believing a heavenly creator God can help you to go to heaven too, but not because there is a creator God, but because your mind want to go to heaven. So try to understand that you should think about your mind, than you think about an unknown god who changed his religion from time to time (from Hinduism to Judaism to Christianity to Islam). You can't trust that creator God, because you don't know his current religion. You creator God is changing his mind, so maybe he will send Christians to the Islamic hell, or maybe he will send Muslims to the Christian hell. ππ So it is difficult to trust that creator God. I guess you came here to support ex-Muslims to save the world from the terrorism of Islam, so you should understand that Islam is using a name of a God (Allah) to do bad things. So if believing a God is enough, then those terrorists will go to heaven too. But that is the reason why they need a God. They do bad things against their heart (mind), but they want a God to get forgiveness. Maybe, that is a good practice to the mind to help you to go to heaven, but I think if you can do good things than bad things then that will be a better practice to help you to go to heaven. Because you must do good things to go to heaven. Think like a heavenly being, And you must understand your mind and body to control you mind. Buddhism helps us to understand our mind and body: Satipatthana Sutta https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zM0ZF3zEcd8
Satipatthana Sutta part 1 to 46 - The direct path to liberation by Joseph Goldstein (English) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VstzwcmhOns&list=PL3ZEkiewOoFCHBwohynCg8IdASm5xWOjD
Suresh (Ranrahas):
Shashini Malsha , Who fine tuned the God?
Can't you see that our world is just one Good planet from many bad planets? So why other planets and suns are not tuned well? Can't you see the probability of the Universe?
And the laws of the Universe are simple than a complex creator God, so don't you think that it is easy to accept the simple laws of the Universe than accepting a creator God. Don't you think that the concept of a creator God destroy the rules of science?
The Universe is a growth of dimensions. And Always there is a balance between dimensions. So that is why there are many posibilities in the Universe including few fine tuned planets.
Everything is moving towards the forth dimension which we call the time. The interaction between main three dimensions and the 'time dimension' is called the energy.
Don't you understand that a God can't come from nothing? But can't you understand that infinity of 6 directions can make 3 to 4 dimensions called the Universe. Can't you understand that the Universe made 'movements' called the 'time' when the 4th dimension unstabled the 3 stable dimensions of the Universe, which created waves of space to balance 4 dimensions inside 3 dimensions. Watch this video completely to learn how it is possible Mathematically: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxxQfSqXDbI
Imagine the start of the Universe. The Universe didn't have a distance to any direction. But the most important thing is that we don't need a distance to show directions, because the 6 directions doesn't require any existence. We usually show directions with a distance like this (If distance from my school to my house = 1Km, then Distance = 1Km and Direction = my school to my house direction): 1km-0km = 1km. But we can show the 6 directions like this too: +0-0 left, +0-0 right, +0-0 up, +0-0 down, +0-0 front, +0-0 back. So we can calculate the thinkness of the Universe like this: (+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0) = (+0-0)6
What if +0-0 can make +0.0-0.0 and +1-1? Then it should be the start of something (distance and dimensions) of the Universe.
Do you know about this mathematical formula:
(a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjRsTHzwZ8M)
What if the a= +0 and b= -0:
(+0-0)2 = 02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 02
(+0-0)6 = (+0-0)2 x (+0-0)2 x (+0-0)2 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
(+1-(-1))3 =
(+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1)
- ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)
The birth of 3 dimensions:
i. (+1)3
ii. (-1)2 x (+1)
iii. ((+1)2 x (-1)
iv. (-1)3
The birth of 4 dimensions:
i. (+1)3 x (-1)
ii. ((-1)2 x (+1)2)
iii. ((+1)2 x (-1)2
iv. ((-1)3 x (+1))
'Quantum entanglement' (‘Spooky action’ builds a wormhole between ‘entangled’ particles) proved the instant connection between dimensions by changing the directions of the 'particles' (dimensional forms of space) at any distance without taking a time. So it proved that the interaction between dimensions are faster than the speed of light. And the speed of light is just a final result from an interaction of dimensions. So we can use the speed of light and other constants of the Universe to find the mathematical connection with the start of the Universe to make the mathematical formula of the Universe to understand 'The Theory Of Everything'.
A creator God doesn't exist: http://buddhist-essentials-and-concepts.blogspot.com/p/does-creator-god-exist-answered.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suresh Madusanka:
Quantum mechanics are mathematics too. Thank you Dr. Don Lincoln for this highly interesting video.
I think we can explain the birth of Matter and Antimatter mathematically.
We can write gaps of 3 directions like this to calculate a solid object: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)
And we can write the gaps of all the 6 directions like 2 objects like this: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)
If you calculte those 6 virtual gaps in the Universe mathematically then you will see how the Universe make +1 distance and and -1 distance with +0.0 and -0.0.
I just show the distance like this: +0-0 because it can show a direction without using a distance. I have mentioned a gap between +0 and -0, but that gap doesn't really exist, because there no distance between it. All the 6 directions can have that +0 and -0 gaps without gaps in beginning, which just represents a direction only. But we can use those gaps to calculate 2 solid objects with three dimensions. A gap between left and right direction (+0-0) and the gap between up and down direction (+0-0) and the gap between front and back direction can make an object (like a cube). So same like that the Universe can make two objects (Matter and Antimatter) using the 6 gaps of the 6 directions, but we can calculate it mathematically to find whether it can make a distance inside those objects or not. And those two objects should be the first two solid objects in the Universe. We can calculate it same like we calculate a solid cube. But because we converted 0 into +0-0 to show directions, we can't use 0 to calculate it, so those 2 objects can have a different shape (rounded shape).
(+0-0)3 x (+0-0)3 = Matter x Antimatter
(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
(+1-(-1))3 =
(+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1)
- ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)
The birth of 3 dimensions:
i. (+1)3
ii. (-1)2 x (+1)
iii. ((+1)2 x (-1)
iv. (-1)3
The birth of 4 dimensions:
i. (+1)3 x (-1)
ii. ((-1)2 x (+1)2)
iii. ((+1)2 x (-1)2
iv. ((-1)3 x (+1))
(+1-(-1))3 made those 8 dimensional forms of space with a nature of Matter and Antimatter which can cause to convert those 8 dimensional forms of space into 16 quantum dimensional forms of space like Quarks, forces and etc.
According to Buddhism there are 8 quantum forms (smallest forms in empty space) called 'Shuddhastaka' (I guess, Shuddha = Pure, Astaka = Eight. So Shuddhastaka = Pure Eight) which made Atoms and etc. So it is also sounds like as same as those 8 dimensional forms of space I mentioned above. 8 Quantum Dimensional Forms Of Empty Space = Four 3D Forms + Four 4D Forms.
- W. Suresh Madusana
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sabine Hossenfelder:
I get constantly asked if I could please comment on other people’s theories of everything. That could be Garrett Lisi’s E8 theory or Eric Weinstein’s geometric unity or Stephen Wolfram’s idea that the universe is but a big graph, and so on. First I explain what physicists mean by a theory of everything and by grand unification (or a grand unified theory, respectively). Then I explain why the current approaches are no very promising but why, forgive me, I nevertheless think it's good to have them.
KeF:
This why I love your channel , you don't just accept things and you are very critical of the state of today's physics . That's the mentality needed , if we are to keep going forward in the advancement of physics . And yes the universe doesnt give a damn ,what we want or what we think as pretty . It is what is it .
Suresh Madusanka:
rv706:
@Suresh Madusanka: Your theory definitely needs to be heard. By a psychiatrist.
Suresh Madusanka:
@rv706 , There are space for 6 dimensions because of the 6 directons of the Universe. I have explained how (+1-(-1))3 dimensions combined and make 8 dimensional formations including 4 dimensional forms with 3 dimensions and 4 dimensional forms with 4 dimensions. And then a 5th dimension (+1-(-1)) from this (+0.0-0.0)3 with a strange field (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which caused to form the 6 quarks, 6 leptons, 4 forces and a strange Higgs boson in standard model in particle physics.
The Universe started from 0 with infinity of directions. In line mathematics, x = 0, y = 0, z = 0. But in 3 dimensional mathematics x = +0-0, y = +0-0, z = +0-0. Because if you show a line you should show a direction like -1 or +1, and in line mathematics we don't show a direction when we write 0. but it doesn't mean that 0 doesn't have a relative direction. So the line mathematics we usually use is not the real mathematics. Real mathematics should show directions of 0 too.
Jake Givein:
@Suresh Madusanka You should first read a textbook like Mathematical Methods by Boas to learn some vector analysis and coordinate systems. That will prevent you from saying stupid stuff like that and will improve your understanding of physics.
Suresh Madusanka:
@Jake Givein, Our common knowledge about mathematics don't help us to make that calculation, because if we use a normal calculator to multiply 0 from a 0 then the result it shows is 0 ( wrong mathematics: 0x0 = 0), but in the reality if we multiply 0 from a 0 (mathematically: 0x0), then the result should be 0.0 (mathematically: 0x0 = 0.0). There is a big difference between 0 and 0.0 (Null). Real mathematics can show how forms can come from nothing (without a distance (0 distance = +0-0)) and from the infinity of the 6 directions.
Imagine the start of the Universe. The Universe didn't have a distance to any direction. But the most important thing is that we don't need a distance to show directions, because the 6 directions doesn't require any existence. We usually show directions with a distance like this (If distance from my school to my house = 1Km, then Distance = 1Km and Direction = my school to my house direction): 1km-0km = 1km. But we can show the 6 directions like this too: +0-0 left, +0-0 right, +0-0 up, +0-0 down, +0-0 front, +0-0 back. So we can calculate the thinkness of the Universe like this: (+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0) = (+0-0)6
I think we can explain the birth of Matter and Antimatter mathematically.
We can write gaps of 3 directions like this to calculate a solid object: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)
And we can write the gaps of all the 6 directions like 2 objects like this: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)
If you calculte those 6 virtual gaps in the Universe mathematically then you will see how the Universe make +1 distance and and -1 distance with +0.0 and -0.0.
I just show the distance like this: +0-0 because it can show a direction without using a distance. I have mentioned a gap between +0 and -0, but that gap doesn't really exist, because there no distance between it. All the 6 directions can have that +0 and -0 gaps without gaps in beginning, which just represents a direction only. But we can use those gaps to calculate 2 solid objects with three dimensions. A gap between left and right direction (+0-0) and the gap between up and down direction (+0-0) and the gap between front and back direction can make an object (like a cube). So same like that the Universe can make two objects (Matter and Antimatter) using the 6 gaps of the 6 directions, but we can calculate it mathematically to find whether it can make a distance inside those objects or not. And those two objects should be the first two solid objects in the Universe. We can calculate it same like we calculate a solid cube. But because we converted 0 into +0-0 to show directions, we can't use 0 to calculate it, so those 2 objects can have a different shape (rounded shape).
(+0-0)3 x (+0-0)3 = Matter x Antimatter
Jake Givein:
@Suresh Madusanka You should put that in a paper and send it to a journal. I'm sure they'll enjoy the entertainment.
In the meantime you should add differential calculus and introductory quantum mechanics to my list of pointers. Otherwise your knowledge will remain the same as your favourite number: 0.
Suresh Madusanka:
@Jake Givein , I'm making another mathematical formula from this (+0-0)6 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 mathematical formula. And then I'll solve it to get the final result from it. I'm going to use my new mathematical formula with the MASS of the particles in standard model to find the speed of light or something like that. Maybe it will be very difficult to solve that mathematical formula to find the speed of light from it, because it is a big mathematical formula which is based on the standard model in particle physics. However, currently I don't know whether it will give me the correct speed of light or not.
I didn't know about the standard model in particle physics when I started to make that calculation around 2 years ago. I just received 8 dimensional formations from it in the beginning, but few weeks ago I just continued that calculation to get the final result, and then I found another dimension (MASS dimension) from it which converted it into 16 dimensional formations with another things (Higgs boson). There are 17 things in the standard model too. However, I'm not a scientist or someone like that, that is why I posted it to here to help someone to disprove my explanation before I show it to mathematicians and scientists.
Thank you for your advice.
Jake Givein:
@Suresh Madusanka Look I'm sure you think you've discovered something here. But what you wrote doesn't mean anything. It's just word salad. If you are interested in fundamental physics and toe's you are going to have to study physics and maths first for ten years or more just to get started. It really takes that long to understand what is already known so you known what needs to be explained next. If you do not have access to a university education you are going to have to read and work through a lot of books. You can find lectures on Youtube, books on Library Genesis and papers on Sci-hub.
Suresh Madusanka:
@Jake Givein , If you don't think that a theory of everything can be a simpIe theory, it is fine, and I can understand you. I hope you checked my first comment which I explained my theory.. (I didn't send it to you.). You can find my theory and conversations from here too: http://buddhist-essentials-and-concepts.blogspot.com/p/my-ideas-and-comments-on-buddhism-page_7.html
Thank you so much for your time and advice.
norman ndaba:
Suresh Madusanka what are you waiting for sir ? Submit a paper to be reviewed by your peers and get this over and done with pronto !
Suresh Madusanka:
@norman ndaba , I'm waiting till I find the speed of light or something like that from a development of it. Sometimes people ignore the cause until they see the effect.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Something can come from nothing and infinity of directions. Watch this video completely to learn how it is possible Mathematically: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxxQfSqXDbI
We can write the main 6 directions like this without using a distance (during the Start of the Universe):
(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)
And we can write it like this too: (+0-0)6
There is a mathematical formula like this:
(+a-b)2 = a2 - 2ab + b2
We can write it like this too: a2 - (+1-(-1)) x a x b + b2
And if the a = 0 and b = 0, then we can write it the mathematical formula like this:
(+0-0)2 = 02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 02
You can see how (+0-0)2 made this (+1-(-1)) distance between 0 and 0 x 0 (between Zero (0) and 0.0 or Null (.)).
If we apply that mathematical formula to this (+0-0)6 then we can get the following results:
(+0-0)6 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+0-0)6
(+0-0)6 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
(+1-(-1))3 =
(+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1)
- ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)
(Eg: (+1) x (+1) x (+1) = (+1)3)
(+1-(-1))3 =
A: (+1)3
B: (+1)3 x (-1)
C: ((-1)2 x (+1)2)
D: (-1)2 x (+1)
E: ((+1)2 x (-1)
F: ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: ((-1)3 x (+1))
H: (-1)3
The 8 main formations in the Universe which made 4D, 3D, 2D and 1D objects like Galaxies, Atoms, Magnetic fields, Solar Systems, Waves like Light and heat and etc after the formation of this +1-(-1))3 obect in the Universe which forms with the every start and restart of the Universe, which formed from 6 Directions with (+0-0)6 zeros between (+0.0-0.0)3 at the edge of the Universe which still form small forms like Space and Energy using dimensions at the edge of the Universe with the expansion of the Universe.
@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@
Abdullah Sameer:
If you like this video, you can download a copy here: http://bit.ly/2Liagk8
Fire Starter:
I love you and your videos Abdullah Sameer for the sake of Allah π who may or may not exist. Just wanted to let you know you’ve given my life a lot of clarity and I’m at a point were I’m not living in fear but living my best life. A year ago I used to get mad at your videos because you made a lot of sense but I didn’t want anymore fuel for my slow progression to disbelief. Now I look forward to them! I’m a proud closeted exmuslim. Sending you and your family love and light - Your Somali Sister
Abdullah Sameer:
Can I share this on twitter/fb?
Fire Starter:
Yes please feel free to!
Somali Woman:
I am a Somali ex Muslim, unfortunately the religion has taken over my entire country, every single Somali woman walking the streets is covered from head to toe, there is no freedom of religion, meaning that Somali Christians, Atheists will be prosecuted. Thank you Abdullah for all that you do, videos like yours would have angered me 2 years ago, now I see my mother living in constant fear, praying multiple times a day, always begging Allah to save her from hell.I don't have to live in fear anymore.
Fire Starter:
kate adam I see a lot of young Somali’s turning away from the faith but they have to be closeted because it risks everything. But it’s nice to see another Somali gaal lol
nujuum Arts:
I also begin to have more doubts lately but felt bit careless and free
Suresh Madusanka:
A Powerful Creator God does not exist to send mad Islamic Murderers to heaven. Some selfish groups use a name of a God to get forgiveness, and to remove their fear about going to Hell. It is a cheating, and they are ignoring their own feelings about good and bad. Impermanent Gods like Brahmas and Devas can exist (Eg: Great Brahma, Maithreya (Next Buddha), Devendra, Jesus. Great Brahma is not a creator God: https://www.accesstoinsight.org/ptf/dhamma/sagga/loka.html). A creator God doesn't exist to create some animals for humans to eat, and that is why the nature of our happy feelings in our mind and body quickly vanish or reduce when we harm and kill or thinking about harming and killing animals. And most animals feel the same, so if a God created our feelings then he will not tell us to ignore it. The Buddha said a lot of things about Hells (Eg: hell beings, animals, ghosts) and Karma to make a fear about it to prevent harming and killing good people for any reason. Both Roman and Arabic empires used a Man and a God to make a book to control people. The bible couldn't prove an existence of a creator God, but the writers of the Quran specially tried to use their knowledge to prove it. Muslim men like to believe Quran because of a lot of Sex and fun for Muslim men in Islam.
A lot of Muslims reject evolution shamelessly, but they try to relate modern science with irrelevent and small verses in Quran to prove an existence of a God. An evolution of the Universe is possible from a cyclic process of the 4 Dimensions (including time) between the 6 Directions. Muslims try to emphasize that a nice world for humans can't exist without a creator God, and Muslims completely ignore the SUFFERING and HELPLESS existence of other living beings. And they make the worlds of animals horrible. Small Muslim children kill animals because of the Quran, and it destroys the kindness in Muslim children. Killing animals is a SIN in some major religions, so the Muslim children are victims of Islam, and it can make them mad. Humans should control the Muslim mad Dogs as same as we control animals.
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can change this for me." - Albert Einstein
Islam teach Muslims how to kill animals, but sometimes it is a training to kill humans. So be aware about the things Muslims tell you about Islam and other religions.
A lot of Islamic preachers earn money and wives. We must let Ex-Muslims talk about Islam to help good Muslim humans to be open-minded to make them advice bad Muslims about fabrications in Islam to prevent bad Muslims being extremists and terrorists with wrong details and fabrications about Science, Human's rights, Women's rights, Animal's rights, Non-Muslim's rights, Ex-Muslim's rights, Rights to learn, Rights to talk, Religious Freedom in Islam. Islam violate a lot of rights, but it entertains the Muslim men.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norman Milroy (Suresh Madusanka):
Atoms, Solar Systems, Black Holes And Galaxies In Buddhism:
"As for the smaller measurements, there are seven dust motes in a mote of airborne dust, seven motes of airborne dust in a rabbit hair, seven rabbit hairs in a sheep hair, seven sheep hairs in a cow hair, seven cow hairs in a gnat, seven gnats in a louse egg, seven lice eggs in a mustard seed, seven mustard seeds in a barley grain, and seven barley grains in a fingertip. Thus, there are nearly two billion dust motes in a fingertip."
(Buddhist Sutta: The Lankavatara Sutra:https://books.google.lk/books?id=OGw7rcVzC1EC Page 56 to 57)
The Shape Of The Earth In Buddhism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxxQfSqXDbI
Flat earth in Islam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrUlO7VLaIE
Flat earth in Bible (including Hebrew Bible): https://www.lockhaven.edu/~dsimanek/febible.htm
"Between every three world systems there is one world interval, which is like the space in the middle of three cart wheels or petals placed so that they touch one another. This world-interval hell (lokahtafikanirayo) measures eight thousand yojanas in size.'"(Anguttara Nikaya 819)
(*It sounds like that there are minimum 3 Habitable Solar Systems in a Galaxy around a Black Hole)
According to Buddhism "There are 3 Habitable World Systems around a WORLD INTERVAL (Black Hole)". But there can be more Solar Systems around a Black Hole (inside a Galaxy) which are not habitabe. "A thousandfold minor world system (Galaxy) can have around 1000 habitable World Systems" too. Siemensbot:
Just shut up. It doesn't even make any sense. That doesn't make it right. There is no higher power in buddhism thats why you can tell us as much as you want about scientific "miracles" and it wouldn't change anything. Where would someone get his knowledge from?
Norman Milroy (Suresh Madusanka):
@Siemensbot , What is the source of God? ππ I know your answer. Your man made 'definition of God' is your source of your God. ππ
Infinity And Directions Can Make Dimensions Called The Universe. So You Don't Need A Creator God.
Dark Matter just use a different dimension, as same as a Block Hole. But the dimensions of the Black Holes and Dark Marter are different. Ordinary matter use a different dimension, and Dark Energy use a different dimension too. Everything is moving towards the forth dimension which we call the time. The interaction between main three dimensions and the 'time dimension' is called the energy. - Suresh. I have explained how dimensions can make those different types of forms:
Something can come from nothing and infinity of directions. Watch this video completely to learn how it is possible Mathematically: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxxQfSqXDbI
The Universe is not only nothing, but also infinite. Nothing and ( x ) infinity create ( = ) forms of +emptiness and -emptiness in between, and the infinity continue that process at the edge of the emptiness (distance) too. 'Nothing' becomes' +Emptiness and -Emptiness when 'Infinity of the 6 directions ((+0-0)6 or (+0.0-0.0)3)' overlap with each other making 4 dimensions inside 3 dimensions which make Time and Distance. And the Universe always has 6 directions (Up,Down,Left,Right,Front,Back) with those nothingness and infinity. Big Bangs and Dark Energy restart and increase the capacity of the Universe (*mathematically: +0-0 to +1,-1 and +0.001,-0.001). If the edge of the Universe is expanding, then we can understand that the edge of the Universe can make space or energy from nothing and infinity (mathematically). We already discovered that an energy called Dark Energy cause to an accelarating expansion of the Universe (including galaxies). So the Dark Energy is the evidence which showed us that it can come from nothing and infinity of directions around the Universe. Dark energy is not static. So the speed of the acceleration of the galaxies will cause to collapse the forms like Galaxies, Dark Matter, Atoms and etc. And then it can cause to make a Big Bang again.
Mathematically: (+0-0)6 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
So,
(+1-(-1))3 made space, galaxies, atoms and etc.
And,
(+0.0-0.0)3 is making space or energy at the edge of the Universe.
Does A Creator God Exist? - Answered: https://buddhist-essentials-and-concepts.blogspot.com/p/does-creator-god-exist-answered.html
Don't try to make a God from nothing. If you think humans or someone else made mathematics, then you are not intelligent enough to continue this discussion.
Siemensbot:
@Norman Milroy First of all I don't waste my time reading so long texts. Why should I even care if Buddhism is the truth or not. It doesn't give me any disadvantages. It can't be the truth. Why should the truth be only in asia? Doesn't make any sense. The believe in God is everywhere on this planet.
Norman Milroy (Suresh Madusanka):
@Siemensbot , If you are sure about your afterlife, then maybe you don't need Buddhism. But now Rebirth is a scientific fact: http://buddhist-essentials-and-concepts.blogspot.com/p/proof-of-existance-of-after-life.html. So if you want to stop rebirth you should practice this: Satipatthana Sutta read by Sally Clough (English) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zUCcu-NXF0 Buddhism was a world religion: Afghanistan-Pre-Islamic Era: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMm9zCh_BxI And still Buddhism is the OLDEST well organised (established) major religion on the earth. Other major religions organised (established) later with new books.
----------------------------------------------------------
What Japanese Girls Think of Christianity and Dating Christians (Interview): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YR9Pc1HQPBE
Joshua Johnston:
@Norman Milroy There have been many man made gods and versions of God made to fit man's standards, but the God of the Bible is the absolute least likely to be man made. He is the only deity to have a clear, moral law for men to follow. Furthermore, God's law and standard often is opposite of what men actually desire to do. When men create gods, they are often arbitrary or have no moral law. Why great a fake deity and the force yourself to meet its standard, even though it's not what you naturally want? Makes no sense. The writers of the Bible as well were convinced that God was real, and feared and obeyed Him. They didn't design him. It should be clear as day, studying history and the human condition, that men didn't design this God.
Also, the flat earth thing is crap, and the Bible doesn't say anything about the earth being flat. It's only dumbasses that misinterpret words like "corners of the earth" who think it says that.
Norman Milroy (Suresh Madusanka):
@Joshua Johnston , Do you know that Infinity And Directions Can Make Dimensions Called The Universe. So You Don't Need A Creator God.
Does A Creator God Exist? - Answered: https://buddhist-essentials-and-concepts.blogspot.com/p/does-creator-god-exist-answered.html
Don't try to make a God from nothing. If you think humans or someone else made mathematics, then you are not intelligent enough.
Jesus was a Buddhist Monk BBC Documentary http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsN4zE2yilo
Someone gave a drink to jesus before he die (maybe to make him look like dead.). Usually people take a long time to die on a Cross, But the Jesus (a powerful person) died in 6 or 9 hours. So it is funny. Joseph of Arimathea arranged a special place to keep the dead body of jesus. It seems that Jesus didn't die on the cross. Because Jesus appeared to many people around 200 to 500 times while he was leaving the Israel. You can't find any detail about Jesus from the age 13 to 30. So maybe he travelled to asia, and then he could practice meditation as a Buddhist monk, which gave him some supernatural powers. However, the other proofs showed that he returned to Kashmir (Yuz Asaf (meaning “Leader of the Healed”/"Son of Joseph") http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_in_Ahmadiyya_Islam). So learn about it more.
Joseph was a relative of Jesus; specifically, Mary's uncle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_of_Arimathea
Joshua Johnston:
@Norman Milroy You try to come off as scientific, but insist on speculation over the accounts we have. Nowhere has anyone said Jesus went to Asia or became a Buddhist. The idea is preposterous and has no evidence. He taught from the Torah.
You come off like someone who hasn't even read the gospels. You claim it would have taken longer for him to die. False. It takes 5-20 hrs to die on a cross, and 9 hrs lies in between that. You fail to recall that Jesus was scourged brutally, having been given a beating that would kill some men. This was BEFORE he went to the cross. You come up with some wacky speculation about someone giving some elixir to him that makes him appear dead. Don't you realize it was a Roman soldier who gave him the vinegar to drink? What reason would a Roman soldier have to fake his death? Furthermore you fail to recall the accounts that Jesus was skewered through the side with a spear, to make sure he was dead. The accounts are clear that He died, yet you don't want to believe the accounts, instead you'd rather rely on speculation. I'm a man of reason and science, so I'll take the accounts over some hair brained speculations.
You've got the universe all figured out havent you? A universe that just created itself for no rhyme or reason. Doesn't explain morals, doesn't explain meaning, and who knows, maybe you believe that there are no objective morals or meaning. Of course that's what you should believe, to be intellectually honest....but your whole post is anything but intellectually honest.
Norman Milroy (Suresh Madusanka):
@Joshua Johnston , Romans almost didn't want to kill Jesus, but some Jews wanted to kill Jesus. Joseph of Arimathea was a rich man, and maybe he tried to protect jesus with the help of the Romans. I was a Roman Catholic, so I know about the Bible. However, watch the BBC documentry to know about the evidence they have about the life of the Jesus. However, I don't like to waste your time, because Christianity is not a big problem to the world. But Islam use a name of a God to destroy human rights and etc.
I could figure out about the existence of the Universe mathematically. It just increases the capacity of it with the cyclic process caused by directions and infinity. There are suffering in this Universe than Happiness (Most animals/ hell beings suffer a lot.), and the Universe don't care about it. I don't have time to explain more about it to you.
"Dark Energy cause to an accelarating expansion of the Universe (including galaxies). So the Dark Energy is the evidence which showed us that it can come nothing and infinity of directions around the Universe", because real mathematics can show that (+0.0-0.0)3 is able to create +0.001 and -0.001, as well as (+0-0)2 is able to create +1 and -1. But our common knowledge about mathematics don't help us to make that calculation, because if we use a normal calculator to multiply 0 from a 0 then the result it shows is 0 ( wrong mathematics: 0x0 = 0), but in the reality if we multiply 0 from a 0 (mathematically: 0x0), then the result should be 0.0 (mathematically: 0x0 = 0.0). There is a big difference between 0 and 0.0 (Null). Real mathematics can show how forms can come from nothing (without a distance (0 distance = +0-0)) and from the infinity of the 6 directions.
Morality is very simple:
1.) Treat others as you want them to treat you.
2.) Try not to harm yourself, try not to harm others.
According to causes and effects, harming others can harm yourself too, because your bad actions can give bad results to you too. It is a science of the body and mind.
Not only materials follow the rule called causes and effects, but also our mind follows it too. So if something survives after the death, then our Karma (action) of the mind will react to it.
Rebirth is the problem. Buddhism is the solution.
Is There Life after Death? Fifty Years of Research at UVA: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AtTM9hgCDw
Near-Death Experiences – Academic Publications: https://med.virginia.edu/perceptual-studies/publications/academic-publications/near-death-experiences-academic-publications/
Proofs of existance of the afterlife: http://buddhist-essentials-and-concepts.blogspot.com/p/proof-of-existance-of-after-life.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agnostic Muslim asks Zakir Naik "Isn't religion used to control people?": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOtUelBT4rQ
Pin Apple:
even if god exists, he isn't worthy of being worshipped
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Pin Apple Yes. That so-called God can't be better than the Universe, because the cyclic process of the Universe let us start again from the beginning if we were wrong, but that so-called God send some people to an eternal hell.
Pin Apple:
@Suresh Wanayalaege any proof of ur claims sir?? really any proof at all... apart frm religious books???uk...i can't expect u to believe in a green blob in d room juss bcoz i want u to....give lectures on God only if u hv any claims supporting it
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Pin Apple I didn't say that a creator God exists. I'm a Buddhist atheist. I meant IF there is a creator God, he is not a Good God, because he send people to an eternal hell.
Timothy Mostad:
@Suresh Wanayalaege
Theists can't or refuse to understand that uninformed people created the gods.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Timothy Mostad , Maybe most of them don't understand it. But when they find an alternative knowledge, then some of them can understand it.
Timothy Mostad:
@Suresh Wanayalaege
To be an antiquated fictional fantasy after reading the whole book, cover to cover.
Muslims are like other cults, never read/understand while they are telling other people it is true, and take other person's word for it instead of finding out for themselves.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Timothy Mostad , Yes. And Muslims can't Question Islam publicly without risking his/her life. Why I Don't Debate Muslim Apologists - Apostate Prophet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQiOiIAnMo8
JDR 353:
Great video sameer..ππ
Islam and Allah is indeed sexual excuse for one man Muhammad ππ©
JOJO FreelancerKUP:
Read the old testament first. Than all those abrahamic faiths collapse.
JDR 353:
@JOJO FreelancerKUP
Read Genesis 19
And Quran 54 : 34
You will know
Which is truth when you see todays Sodom and gomorrah.....π€ͺπ
Hasanul S:
@JOJO FreelancerKUP OT doesn't support pedophilia, war or sexual perversion. Indeed those who were sexually perverted were punished by the Lord.
JOJO FreelancerKUP:
@JDR 353 today sodom and gomora? Learn your history.
JOJO FreelancerKUP:
@Hasanul S https://www.therichest.com/shocking/15-naughty-verses-you-wont-believe-came-from-the-bible/
JDR 353:
@JOJO FreelancerKUP
Hey go and see for Sodom and gomorrah filled with brimstone and sulphur
Not storm of stones
Since Allah doesn't even know what's in Sodom and gomorrah....π€ͺπ€ͺ
JOJO FreelancerKUP:
@JDR 353 https://youtu.be/5YPVtSaqwi4
JDR 353:
@Suresh Wanayalaege
Lord Jesus Christ said
Matthew 16 : 23
Get behind me satan for you dont have any eternal concerns but merely Himan concerns...
Stupid boy ....
Dont Mock yourself
JOJO FreelancerKUP:
@Suresh Wanayalaege https://youtu.be/5YPVtSaqwi4
JOJO FreelancerKUP:
@Suresh Wanayalaege Are you Buddhist? Budhism makes more scence than Christianity
fish you:
@JOJO FreelancerKUP buddhism makes sense???u need a doctor ππ
JOJO FreelancerKUP:
@fish you It makes much more sence than a god who sacrafices himself for himself to save humanity from himself. πππππππππππππππ
US MOOSLIMS IS SPESHUL PEEPLES US NEEDS RESPECKT:
@fish you Buddhism makes 10000 times sense than Abrahamic religions
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@JOJO FreelancerKUP , Thank you.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@JOJO FreelancerKUP , Yes, I'm a Buddhist. I converted from Roman Catholic when I was around 11 years old.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@fish you , This is the most important thing you should know in Buddhism: Satipatthana Sutta (shortly) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zUCcu-NXF0
Satipatthana sutta (Fully) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zM0ZF3zEcd8
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@JDR 353 , I know that the so-called creator God is dangerous. He tells us to accept him or burn in hell forever. He is just like a leader of a Mafia gang. If you want to go to heaven then you should practice your mind to do it. Believing heaven and heavenly beings is a part of Buddhist practice too. Maybe believing a heavenly creator God can help you to go to heaven too, but not because there is a creator God, but because your mind want to go to heaven. So try to understand that you should think about your mind, than you think about an unknown god who changed his religion from time to time (from Hinduism to Judaism to Christianity to Islam). You can't trust that creator God, because you don't know his current religion. You creator God is changing his mind, so maybe he will send Christians to the Islamic hell, or maybe he will send Muslims to the Christian hell. ππ So it is difficult to trust that creator God. I guess you came here to support ex-Muslims to save the world from the terrorism of Islam, so you should understand that Islam is using a name of a God (Allah) to do bad things. So if believing a God is enough, then those terrorists will go to heaven too. But that is the reason why they need a God. They do bad things against their heart (mind), but they want a God to get forgiveness. Maybe, that is a good practice to the mind to help you to go to heaven, but I think if you can do good things than bad things then that will be a better practice to help you to go to heaven. Because you must do good things to go to heaven. Think like a heavenly being, And you must understand your mind and body to control you mind. Buddhism helps us to understand our mind and body: Satipatthana Sutta https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zM0ZF3zEcd8
Satipatthana Sutta part 1 to 46 - The direct path to liberation by Joseph Goldstein (English) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VstzwcmhOns&list=PL3ZEkiewOoFCHBwohynCg8IdASm5xWOjD
----------------------------------------------------------------
Suresh (Ranrahas):
Shashini Malsha , Who fine tuned the God?
Can't you see that our world is just one Good planet from many bad planets? So why other planets and suns are not tuned well? Can't you see the probability of the Universe?
And the laws of the Universe are simple than a complex creator God, so don't you think that it is easy to accept the simple laws of the Universe than accepting a creator God. Don't you think that the concept of a creator God destroy the rules of science?
The Universe is a growth of dimensions. And Always there is a balance between dimensions. So that is why there are many posibilities in the Universe including few fine tuned planets.
Everything is moving towards the forth dimension which we call the time. The interaction between main three dimensions and the 'time dimension' is called the energy.
Don't you understand that a God can't come from nothing? But can't you understand that infinity of 6 directions can make 3 to 4 dimensions called the Universe. Can't you understand that the Universe made 'movements' called the 'time' when the 4th dimension unstabled the 3 stable dimensions of the Universe, which created waves of space to balance 4 dimensions inside 3 dimensions. Watch this video completely to learn how it is possible Mathematically: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxxQfSqXDbI
Imagine the start of the Universe. The Universe didn't have a distance to any direction. But the most important thing is that we don't need a distance to show directions, because the 6 directions doesn't require any existence. We usually show directions with a distance like this (If distance from my school to my house = 1Km, then Distance = 1Km and Direction = my school to my house direction): 1km-0km = 1km. But we can show the 6 directions like this too: +0-0 left, +0-0 right, +0-0 up, +0-0 down, +0-0 front, +0-0 back. So we can calculate the thinkness of the Universe like this: (+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0) = (+0-0)6
What if +0-0 can make +0.0-0.0 and +1-1? Then it should be the start of something (distance and dimensions) of the Universe.
Do you know about this mathematical formula:
(a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjRsTHzwZ8M)
What if the a= +0 and b= -0:
(+0-0)2 = 02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 02
(+0-0)6 = (+0-0)2 x (+0-0)2 x (+0-0)2 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
(+1-(-1))3 =
(+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1)
- ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)
The birth of 3 dimensions:
i. (+1)3
ii. (-1)2 x (+1)
iii. ((+1)2 x (-1)
iv. (-1)3
The birth of 4 dimensions:
i. (+1)3 x (-1)
ii. ((-1)2 x (+1)2)
iii. ((+1)2 x (-1)2
iv. ((-1)3 x (+1))
'Quantum entanglement' (‘Spooky action’ builds a wormhole between ‘entangled’ particles) proved the instant connection between dimensions by changing the directions of the 'particles' (dimensional forms of space) at any distance without taking a time. So it proved that the interaction between dimensions are faster than the speed of light. And the speed of light is just a final result from an interaction of dimensions. So we can use the speed of light and other constants of the Universe to find the mathematical connection with the start of the Universe to make the mathematical formula of the Universe to understand 'The Theory Of Everything'.
A creator God doesn't exist: http://buddhist-essentials-and-concepts.blogspot.com/p/does-creator-god-exist-answered.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suresh Madusanka:
Quantum mechanics are mathematics too. Thank you Dr. Don Lincoln for this highly interesting video.
I think we can explain the birth of Matter and Antimatter mathematically.
We can write gaps of 3 directions like this to calculate a solid object: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)
And we can write the gaps of all the 6 directions like 2 objects like this: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)
If you calculte those 6 virtual gaps in the Universe mathematically then you will see how the Universe make +1 distance and and -1 distance with +0.0 and -0.0.
I just show the distance like this: +0-0 because it can show a direction without using a distance. I have mentioned a gap between +0 and -0, but that gap doesn't really exist, because there no distance between it. All the 6 directions can have that +0 and -0 gaps without gaps in beginning, which just represents a direction only. But we can use those gaps to calculate 2 solid objects with three dimensions. A gap between left and right direction (+0-0) and the gap between up and down direction (+0-0) and the gap between front and back direction can make an object (like a cube). So same like that the Universe can make two objects (Matter and Antimatter) using the 6 gaps of the 6 directions, but we can calculate it mathematically to find whether it can make a distance inside those objects or not. And those two objects should be the first two solid objects in the Universe. We can calculate it same like we calculate a solid cube. But because we converted 0 into +0-0 to show directions, we can't use 0 to calculate it, so those 2 objects can have a different shape (rounded shape).
(+0-0)3 x (+0-0)3 = Matter x Antimatter
(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
(+1-(-1))3 =
(+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1)
- ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)
The birth of 3 dimensions:
i. (+1)3
ii. (-1)2 x (+1)
iii. ((+1)2 x (-1)
iv. (-1)3
The birth of 4 dimensions:
i. (+1)3 x (-1)
ii. ((-1)2 x (+1)2)
iii. ((+1)2 x (-1)2
iv. ((-1)3 x (+1))
(+1-(-1))3 made those 8 dimensional forms of space with a nature of Matter and Antimatter which can cause to convert those 8 dimensional forms of space into 16 quantum dimensional forms of space like Quarks, forces and etc.
According to Buddhism there are 8 quantum forms (smallest forms in empty space) called 'Shuddhastaka' (I guess, Shuddha = Pure, Astaka = Eight. So Shuddhastaka = Pure Eight) which made Atoms and etc. So it is also sounds like as same as those 8 dimensional forms of space I mentioned above. 8 Quantum Dimensional Forms Of Empty Space = Four 3D Forms + Four 4D Forms.
- W. Suresh Madusana
Do we need a Theory of Everything?
Sabine Hossenfelder:
I get constantly asked if I could please comment on other people’s theories of everything. That could be Garrett Lisi’s E8 theory or Eric Weinstein’s geometric unity or Stephen Wolfram’s idea that the universe is but a big graph, and so on. First I explain what physicists mean by a theory of everything and by grand unification (or a grand unified theory, respectively). Then I explain why the current approaches are no very promising but why, forgive me, I nevertheless think it's good to have them.
KeF:
This why I love your channel , you don't just accept things and you are very critical of the state of today's physics . That's the mentality needed , if we are to keep going forward in the advancement of physics . And yes the universe doesnt give a damn ,what we want or what we think as pretty . It is what is it .
Suresh Madusanka:
I like the video so much, but I have a theory of everything too.
According to Buddhism SuddhΔαΉαΉhaka (“suddha” for “pure” or fundamental” + “ΔαΉαΉha” or “eight”) means a unit of matter consisting of eight fundamental entities. Four of these are the “satara mahΔ bhΕ«ta“ (The Four Great BhΕ«ta. BhΕ«ta is another name for “ghost” because of their elusive nature.): Pathavi (Solid/Earth), Δpo (Liquid/Water), tejo (Heat/Fire), vΔyo (Gas/Air). These are indeed the most fundamental units of matter, but they cannot be detected by themselves. The four mahΔ bhΕ«ta ('Matter') are with four basic “gati” ('Character of Matter'/ 'Antimatter'): Pathavi gati (hard/coarse), Δpo gati (bound/attracted/liquidity), tejo gati (fiery or energetic), vΔyo gati (motion). Thus, in Buddha Dhamma, it says, “gati (character) attracts a similar gati”. (*Read more about "The Origin of Matter – SuddhΔαΉαΉhaka" at Pure Dhamma website.)
According to my mathematical calculations the Universe can make two objects (Matter and Antimatter) using the 6 gaps of the 6 directions:
(+0-0)3 x (+0-0)3 = Matter x Antimatter
According to this mathematical formula (a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2 we can write (+0-0)2 as 02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 02
(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
(+1-(-1))3 can make 8 dimensional forms of space with a nature of Matter and Antimatter which can cause to convert those 8 dimensional forms of space into 16 quantum dimensional forms of space like Quarks, forces and etc.
(+0.0-0.0)3 can make extra dimensions, Higgs boson and etc.
Possible or Probable Outputs of (+0.0-0.0)3
(+0.0-0.0)3 = (+0.0-0.0)x(+0.0-0.0)x(+0.0-0.0)
The Most Possible Output:
(+0.0-0.0)3
= (0.02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0.0 x 0.0 + 0.02)x(+0.0-0.0)
= ((+1-(-1)) x 0.000 - (+1-(-1)) x 0.000)x(+0.0-0.0)
= ((+1-(-1)) x (0.000 - 0.000))x(+0.0-0.0)
(+0.0-0.0)3 = ((+1-(-1)) x (0.000 - 0.000)) x (+0.0-0.0)
I write it like this for identification:
(+0.0-0.0)3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Now we can combine the results of (+0.0-0.0)3 with the results of (+1-(-1))3 to see the most possible total result:
(+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 =
(+ (+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3))
x (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
(+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 =
(+ (+(1))(+1)3 - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (+(1))(-1)3)
- (+ (-(1))(+1)3 - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-(1))(-1)3)))
x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
It gives 16 results and this unbalanced result (Higgs boson): (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Now I can show all the most possible results (the 16 dimensional forms in atoms called quarks, forces and etc) like this:
Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)6
=
i: (+1-(-1))3
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: SuddhΔtthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas)
A: + (+1)3
B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)
C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))
D: + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (
E: + (+1)2 x (-1)
F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))
H: + (-1)3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the 12 elementary particles (of matter) and 4 basic forces in Standard Model (in particle physics). 12 Elementary particles: (6 quarks:) up, charm, top, Down, Strange, Bottom and (3 electrons:) electron, muon, tau and (three neutrinos:) e, muon, tau. And 4 basic forces: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force.
01: + (+(1))(+1)3
02: - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
03: - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
04: + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
05: + (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
06: - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
07: - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
08: + (+(1))(-1)3
)
- (
09: + (-(1))(+1)3
10: - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
11: - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
12: + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
13: + (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
14: - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
15: - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
16: + (-(1))(-1)3))
))) x
This should be the Higgs boson in Standard Model (in particle physics):
17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Each electron has an electrical charge of -1. Quarks make up protons and neutrons, which, in turn, make up an atom's nucleus. Each proton and each neutron contains three quarks.
The Higgs boson field came from this: (+0.0-0.0)3
And this (+0.0-0.0)3 is combined to this: (+1-(-1))3
So always there is an interaction between the final resultS of this: (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 with this (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which can make a mathematical connection between those things. (Eg: Tau : Muon : Electron = 2000 : 100 : 0.5 = 4000 : 200 : 1)
The reason to the birth of Atoms is the reason to The Origin of Matter and Antimatter. And it is the first part of 'The Theory Of Everything'.
- W. Suresh Madusanka
(The founder of that mathematical explanation about the start of the Universe and Atoms.)
According to Buddhism SuddhΔαΉαΉhaka (“suddha” for “pure” or fundamental” + “ΔαΉαΉha” or “eight”) means a unit of matter consisting of eight fundamental entities. Four of these are the “satara mahΔ bhΕ«ta“ (The Four Great BhΕ«ta. BhΕ«ta is another name for “ghost” because of their elusive nature.): Pathavi (Solid/Earth), Δpo (Liquid/Water), tejo (Heat/Fire), vΔyo (Gas/Air). These are indeed the most fundamental units of matter, but they cannot be detected by themselves. The four mahΔ bhΕ«ta ('Matter') are with four basic “gati” ('Character of Matter'/ 'Antimatter'): Pathavi gati (hard/coarse), Δpo gati (bound/attracted/liquidity), tejo gati (fiery or energetic), vΔyo gati (motion). Thus, in Buddha Dhamma, it says, “gati (character) attracts a similar gati”. (*Read more about "The Origin of Matter – SuddhΔαΉαΉhaka" at Pure Dhamma website.)
According to my mathematical calculations the Universe can make two objects (Matter and Antimatter) using the 6 gaps of the 6 directions:
(+0-0)3 x (+0-0)3 = Matter x Antimatter
According to this mathematical formula (a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2 we can write (+0-0)2 as 02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 02
(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
(+1-(-1))3 can make 8 dimensional forms of space with a nature of Matter and Antimatter which can cause to convert those 8 dimensional forms of space into 16 quantum dimensional forms of space like Quarks, forces and etc.
(+0.0-0.0)3 can make extra dimensions, Higgs boson and etc.
Possible or Probable Outputs of (+0.0-0.0)3
(+0.0-0.0)3 = (+0.0-0.0)x(+0.0-0.0)x(+0.0-0.0)
The Most Possible Output:
(+0.0-0.0)3
= (0.02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0.0 x 0.0 + 0.02)x(+0.0-0.0)
= ((+1-(-1)) x 0.000 - (+1-(-1)) x 0.000)x(+0.0-0.0)
= ((+1-(-1)) x (0.000 - 0.000))x(+0.0-0.0)
(+0.0-0.0)3 = ((+1-(-1)) x (0.000 - 0.000)) x (+0.0-0.0)
I write it like this for identification:
(+0.0-0.0)3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Now we can combine the results of (+0.0-0.0)3 with the results of (+1-(-1))3 to see the most possible total result:
(+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 =
(+ (+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3))
x (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
(+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 =
(+ (+(1))(+1)3 - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (+(1))(-1)3)
- (+ (-(1))(+1)3 - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-(1))(-1)3)))
x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
It gives 16 results and this unbalanced result (Higgs boson): (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Now I can show all the most possible results (the 16 dimensional forms in atoms called quarks, forces and etc) like this:
Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)6
=
i: (+1-(-1))3
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: SuddhΔtthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas)
A: + (+1)3
B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)
C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))
D: + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (
E: + (+1)2 x (-1)
F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))
H: + (-1)3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the 12 elementary particles (of matter) and 4 basic forces in Standard Model (in particle physics). 12 Elementary particles: (6 quarks:) up, charm, top, Down, Strange, Bottom and (3 electrons:) electron, muon, tau and (three neutrinos:) e, muon, tau. And 4 basic forces: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force.
01: + (+(1))(+1)3
02: - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
03: - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
04: + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
05: + (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
06: - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
07: - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
08: + (+(1))(-1)3
)
- (
09: + (-(1))(+1)3
10: - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
11: - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
12: + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
13: + (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
14: - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
15: - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
16: + (-(1))(-1)3))
))) x
This should be the Higgs boson in Standard Model (in particle physics):
17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Each electron has an electrical charge of -1. Quarks make up protons and neutrons, which, in turn, make up an atom's nucleus. Each proton and each neutron contains three quarks.
The Higgs boson field came from this: (+0.0-0.0)3
And this (+0.0-0.0)3 is combined to this: (+1-(-1))3
So always there is an interaction between the final resultS of this: (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 with this (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which can make a mathematical connection between those things. (Eg: Tau : Muon : Electron = 2000 : 100 : 0.5 = 4000 : 200 : 1)
The reason to the birth of Atoms is the reason to The Origin of Matter and Antimatter. And it is the first part of 'The Theory Of Everything'.
- W. Suresh Madusanka
(The founder of that mathematical explanation about the start of the Universe and Atoms.)
rv706:
@Suresh Madusanka: Your theory definitely needs to be heard. By a psychiatrist.
Suresh Madusanka:
@rv706 , There are space for 6 dimensions because of the 6 directons of the Universe. I have explained how (+1-(-1))3 dimensions combined and make 8 dimensional formations including 4 dimensional forms with 3 dimensions and 4 dimensional forms with 4 dimensions. And then a 5th dimension (+1-(-1)) from this (+0.0-0.0)3 with a strange field (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which caused to form the 6 quarks, 6 leptons, 4 forces and a strange Higgs boson in standard model in particle physics.
The Universe started from 0 with infinity of directions. In line mathematics, x = 0, y = 0, z = 0. But in 3 dimensional mathematics x = +0-0, y = +0-0, z = +0-0. Because if you show a line you should show a direction like -1 or +1, and in line mathematics we don't show a direction when we write 0. but it doesn't mean that 0 doesn't have a relative direction. So the line mathematics we usually use is not the real mathematics. Real mathematics should show directions of 0 too.
Jake Givein:
@Suresh Madusanka You should first read a textbook like Mathematical Methods by Boas to learn some vector analysis and coordinate systems. That will prevent you from saying stupid stuff like that and will improve your understanding of physics.
Suresh Madusanka:
@Jake Givein, Our common knowledge about mathematics don't help us to make that calculation, because if we use a normal calculator to multiply 0 from a 0 then the result it shows is 0 ( wrong mathematics: 0x0 = 0), but in the reality if we multiply 0 from a 0 (mathematically: 0x0), then the result should be 0.0 (mathematically: 0x0 = 0.0). There is a big difference between 0 and 0.0 (Null). Real mathematics can show how forms can come from nothing (without a distance (0 distance = +0-0)) and from the infinity of the 6 directions.
Imagine the start of the Universe. The Universe didn't have a distance to any direction. But the most important thing is that we don't need a distance to show directions, because the 6 directions doesn't require any existence. We usually show directions with a distance like this (If distance from my school to my house = 1Km, then Distance = 1Km and Direction = my school to my house direction): 1km-0km = 1km. But we can show the 6 directions like this too: +0-0 left, +0-0 right, +0-0 up, +0-0 down, +0-0 front, +0-0 back. So we can calculate the thinkness of the Universe like this: (+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0) = (+0-0)6
I think we can explain the birth of Matter and Antimatter mathematically.
We can write gaps of 3 directions like this to calculate a solid object: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)
And we can write the gaps of all the 6 directions like 2 objects like this: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)
If you calculte those 6 virtual gaps in the Universe mathematically then you will see how the Universe make +1 distance and and -1 distance with +0.0 and -0.0.
I just show the distance like this: +0-0 because it can show a direction without using a distance. I have mentioned a gap between +0 and -0, but that gap doesn't really exist, because there no distance between it. All the 6 directions can have that +0 and -0 gaps without gaps in beginning, which just represents a direction only. But we can use those gaps to calculate 2 solid objects with three dimensions. A gap between left and right direction (+0-0) and the gap between up and down direction (+0-0) and the gap between front and back direction can make an object (like a cube). So same like that the Universe can make two objects (Matter and Antimatter) using the 6 gaps of the 6 directions, but we can calculate it mathematically to find whether it can make a distance inside those objects or not. And those two objects should be the first two solid objects in the Universe. We can calculate it same like we calculate a solid cube. But because we converted 0 into +0-0 to show directions, we can't use 0 to calculate it, so those 2 objects can have a different shape (rounded shape).
(+0-0)3 x (+0-0)3 = Matter x Antimatter
Jake Givein:
@Suresh Madusanka You should put that in a paper and send it to a journal. I'm sure they'll enjoy the entertainment.
In the meantime you should add differential calculus and introductory quantum mechanics to my list of pointers. Otherwise your knowledge will remain the same as your favourite number: 0.
Suresh Madusanka:
@Jake Givein , I'm making another mathematical formula from this (+0-0)6 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 mathematical formula. And then I'll solve it to get the final result from it. I'm going to use my new mathematical formula with the MASS of the particles in standard model to find the speed of light or something like that. Maybe it will be very difficult to solve that mathematical formula to find the speed of light from it, because it is a big mathematical formula which is based on the standard model in particle physics. However, currently I don't know whether it will give me the correct speed of light or not.
I didn't know about the standard model in particle physics when I started to make that calculation around 2 years ago. I just received 8 dimensional formations from it in the beginning, but few weeks ago I just continued that calculation to get the final result, and then I found another dimension (MASS dimension) from it which converted it into 16 dimensional formations with another things (Higgs boson). There are 17 things in the standard model too. However, I'm not a scientist or someone like that, that is why I posted it to here to help someone to disprove my explanation before I show it to mathematicians and scientists.
Thank you for your advice.
Jake Givein:
@Suresh Madusanka Look I'm sure you think you've discovered something here. But what you wrote doesn't mean anything. It's just word salad. If you are interested in fundamental physics and toe's you are going to have to study physics and maths first for ten years or more just to get started. It really takes that long to understand what is already known so you known what needs to be explained next. If you do not have access to a university education you are going to have to read and work through a lot of books. You can find lectures on Youtube, books on Library Genesis and papers on Sci-hub.
Suresh Madusanka:
@Jake Givein , If you don't think that a theory of everything can be a simpIe theory, it is fine, and I can understand you. I hope you checked my first comment which I explained my theory.. (I didn't send it to you.). You can find my theory and conversations from here too: http://buddhist-essentials-and-concepts.blogspot.com/p/my-ideas-and-comments-on-buddhism-page_7.html
Thank you so much for your time and advice.
norman ndaba:
Suresh Madusanka what are you waiting for sir ? Submit a paper to be reviewed by your peers and get this over and done with pronto !
Suresh Madusanka:
@norman ndaba , I'm waiting till I find the speed of light or something like that from a development of it. Sometimes people ignore the cause until they see the effect.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Atom- The Illusion Of Reality (Jim Al-Khalili) - Science Documentary - Reel Truth Science
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Suresh Madusanka:
If you are interested about theories of everything. You can check my theory too:
Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)6
=
i: (+1-(-1))3
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: SuddhΔtthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas)
A: + (+1)3
B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)
C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))
D: + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (
E: + (+1)2 x (-1)
F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))
H: + (-1)3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the 12 elementary particles (of matter) and 4 basic forces in Standard Model (in particle physics). 12 Elementary particles: (6 quarks:) up, charm, top, Down, Strange, Bottom and (3 electrons:) electron, muon, tau and (three neutrinos:) e, muon, tau. And 4 basic forces: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force.
01: + (+(1))(+1)3
02: - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
03: - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
04: + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
05: + (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
06: - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
07: - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
08: + (+(1))(-1)3
)
- (
09: + (-(1))(+1)3
10: - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
11: - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
12: + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
13: + (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
14: - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
15: - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
16: + (-(1))(-1)3))
))) x
This should be the Higgs boson in Standard Model (in particle physics):
17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
- W. Suresh Madusanka
I hope it sounds good to you.
I used a special type of methematics to make those calculations, and I call it 3 dimensional mathematics.
En thΓ©o:
@Suresh Madusanka
I think youtube it's not the best place to discuss anything that advanced. Surely there are better place on internet for that ?
Suresh Madusanka:
@En thΓ©o , Yes, I can understand.
En thΓ©o:
@Suresh Madusanka
Good luck with your theory, pal. Hope you get developments.
Suresh Madusanka:
@En thΓ©o , Thanks. I'll try to develop it to connect it with Quantum Physics..
Theory of Everything Livestreams with Amazing Guests - PBS Space Time
If you are interested about theories of everything. You can check my theory too:
Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)6
=
i: (+1-(-1))3
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: SuddhΔtthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas)
A: + (+1)3
B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)
C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))
D: + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (
E: + (+1)2 x (-1)
F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))
H: + (-1)3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the 12 elementary particles (of matter) and 4 basic forces in Standard Model (in particle physics). 12 Elementary particles: (6 quarks:) up, charm, top, Down, Strange, Bottom and (3 electrons:) electron, muon, tau and (three neutrinos:) e, muon, tau. And 4 basic forces: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force.
01: + (+(1))(+1)3
02: - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
03: - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
04: + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
05: + (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
06: - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
07: - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
08: + (+(1))(-1)3
)
- (
09: + (-(1))(+1)3
10: - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
11: - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
12: + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
13: + (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
14: - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
15: - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
16: + (-(1))(-1)3))
))) x
This should be the Higgs boson in Standard Model (in particle physics):
17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
- W. Suresh Madusanka
I hope it sounds good to you.
I used a special type of methematics to make those calculations, and I call it 3 dimensional mathematics.
En thΓ©o:
@Suresh Madusanka
I think youtube it's not the best place to discuss anything that advanced. Surely there are better place on internet for that ?
Suresh Madusanka:
@En thΓ©o , Yes, I can understand.
En thΓ©o:
@Suresh Madusanka
Good luck with your theory, pal. Hope you get developments.
Suresh Madusanka:
@En thΓ©o , Thanks. I'll try to develop it to connect it with Quantum Physics..
---------------------------------------------------
Roleyboon YouTube:
@Suresh Madusanka Brother, I'm not nearly educated in mathematics enough to fully understand what's going on in this equation, so I apologise.
But, I deeply appreciate you taking the time to show me this. It's exciting to know that there are smart and knowledgeable people out there dedicating real time to exploring these concepts!
What exactly is this equation telling us?
π❤
Suresh Madusanka:
@Roleyboon YouTube, Thank you for your reply.
There are few levels in my mathematical calculations, which I have separated using brackets '()' and etc, so it shows a structure, but currently it doesn't explain that whether it has a fixed size for the structure or not, and it can be a series of structures which caused to make many different types of atoms and etc.
We usually show directions with a distance like this (If distance from my school to my house = 1Km, then Distance = 1Km and Direction = my school to my house direction): 1km-0km = 1km. But we can show the 6 directions like this too: +0-0 left, +0-0 right, +0-0 up, +0-0 down, +0-0 front, +0-0 back. So we can calculate the thinkness of the Universe like this: (+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0) = (+0-0)6
What if +0-0 can make +0.0-0.0 and +1-1? Then it should be the start of something (distance and dimensions) of the Universe.
Do you know about this mathematical formula:
(a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjRsTHzwZ8M)
What if the a= +0 and b= -0:
(+0-0)2 = 02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 02
(+0-0)6 = (+0-0)2 x (+0-0)2 x (+0-0)2 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
I'm making another mathematical formula from this (+0-0)6 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 mathematical formula. And then I'll solve it to get the final result from it. I'm going to use my new mathematical formula with the MASS of the particles in standard model to find the speed of light or something like that. Maybe it will be very difficult to solve that mathematical formula to find the speed of light from it, because it is a big mathematical formula which is based on the standard model in particle physics. However, currently I don't know whether it will give me the correct speed of light or not.
I didn't know about the standard model in particle physics when I started to make that calculation around 2 years ago. I just received 8 dimensional formations from it in the beginning, but few weeks ago I just continued that calculation to get the final result, and then I found another dimension (MASS dimension) from it which converted it into 16 dimensional formations with another things (Higgs boson). There are 17 things in the standard model too. However, I'm not a scientist or someone like that, that is why I posted it to here to help someone to disprove my explanation before I show it to mathematicians and scientists.
There are space for 6 dimensions because of the 6 directons of the Universe. I have explained how (+1-(-1))3 dimensions combined and make 8 dimensional formations including 4 dimensional forms with 3 dimensions and 4 dimensional forms with 4 dimensions. And then a 5th dimension (+1-(-1)) from this (+0.0-0.0)3 with a strange field (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which caused to form the 6 quarks, 6 leptons, 4 forces and a strange Higgs boson in standard model in particle physics.
------------------------
Finding The Theory Of Everything
Knowing God’s thoughts: Einstein’s unfinished dream – Public lecture by Dr. Don Lincoln
Suresh Madusanka (1 day ago / 1st-Oct):
This is my theory of everything:
Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)6
=
i: (+1-(-1))3
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: SuddhΔtthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas)
A: + (+1)3
B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)
C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))
D: + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (
E: + (+1)2 x (-1)
F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))
H: + (-1)3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the 12 elementary particles (of matter) and 4 basic forces in Standard Model (in particle physics). 12 Elementary particles: (6 quarks:) up, charm, top, Down, Strange, Bottom and (3 electrons:) electron, muon, tau and (three neutrinos:) e, muon, tau. And 4 basic forces: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force.
01: + (+(1))(+1)3
02: - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
03: - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
04: + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
05: + (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
06: - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
07: - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
08: + (+(1))(-1)3
)
- (
09: + (-(1))(+1)3
10: - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
11: - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
12: + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
13: + (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
14: - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
15: - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
16: + (-(1))(-1)3))
))) x
This should be the Higgs boson in Standard Model (in particle physics):
17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
- W. Suresh Madusanka
If someone can understand it, then I can explain more about it.!
Pero Juric:
The fu*k?
He is Mi and I am Yu:
I guess the next big breakthrough in physics may come from a bright mind with radical new ideas.
So, good on you for trying, I applaude you.
Jimmy:
You’re missing a bracket
He is Mi and I am Yu:
@Jimmy Ah dangit, there goes the nobel prize...
Chris Zachtian:
Zero day
Art Rose:
Please don't.
Suresh Madusanka:
@Jimmy , Yes, I'll correct it.
Suresh Madusanka:
@He is Mi and I am Yu, I was completing few more steps of it from yesterday (1st Oct) morning to until now (2Am) to send it to here:
There is space for 6 dimensions because of the 6 directons of the Universe. I have explained how (+1-(-1))3 dimensions combined and make 8 dimensional formations including 4 dimensional forms with 3 dimensions and 4 dimensional forms with 4 dimensions. And then a 5th dimension (+1-(-1)) from this (+0.0-0.0)3 with a strange field (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which caused to form the 6 quarks, 6 leptons, 4 forces and a strange Higgs boson in standard model in particle physics.
(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
(+0.0-0.0)3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Most Possible or Probable Outputs of (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) :
(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.0-0.0) x (0) x (0) x (+0.0-0.0) ----(A)
(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) x (+0.0x(0)-0.0x(0)) ----(B)
From the (A):
(+0.000 - 0.000) x 1_.. = (+0.0-0.0) x (0) x (0) x 1..x(1/1) ----(P)
((+0.000 - 0.000) x 1_..)/ ((0) x 1..x(1/1)) = (+0.0-0.0) x (0) ----(C)
From the (B) and (C):
(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) x ((+0.000 - 0.000) x 1_..)/ ((0) x 1..x(1/1))
1_.... x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) x (1....x(3/3) x 1_..)/ ((0) x 1..x(1/1)) ----(Q)
1_.... x 1..x(1/1) x (+0.0-0.0) x (0) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_..) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) ----(D)
From the (B) and (D):
(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.0x(0)-0.0x(0)) x 1_.... x 1..x(1/1) x (+0.0-0.0) x (0) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_..)
(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.00-0.00) x (+0.00-0.00) x 1_.... x 1..x(1/1) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_..)
Using this (a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2 Mathematical formula to get the Most Possible or Probable Outputs of this result:
(+0.00-0.00) x (+0.00-0.00) x 1_.... x 1..x(1/1) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_..)
= (0.00^2 - (1...... x 1......) x 0.00 x 0.00 + 0.00^2) x 1_.... x 1....x(3/3) / (1......x(5/5) x 1_..)
= (0.00000 - (1......) x 0.00000 /(5/5) + 0.00000) x 1_.... x 1....x(3/3) / 1_..
= ((0.00000 + 0.00000) x 1....x(3/3) - (1......) x 0.00000 /(5/5) x 1....x(3/3)) x 1_.... / 1_..
Starting to use the 6th dimension. But it makes many small forms of it, because it is unable to make a large main dimension.
= ((0.00000 + 0.00000) x 1....x(3/3) - (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 /(5/5)) x 1_.... / 1_..
= (((1 x 0.00000 + 1 x 0.00000) x 1....x(3/3)) - ((+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 /(5/5))) x 1_.... / 1_..
= (0.00000 x 2...., x (+0.5......-(-0.5......))x(3/3) - (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 /(5/5)) x 1_.... / 1_..
= (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x (0.00000 x 2...., x(3/3) - 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 /(5/5)) x 1_.... / 1_..
= (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x (2...., x(3/3) - 1....x(3/3) /(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / 1_..
= (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 3 x (2....,/3 - 1..../3 /(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / 1_..
= (+1.5......-(-1.5......)) x (2....,/3 - 1..../3 /(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / 1_..
= (+0.5......-(-0.5......) +1.......-(-1.......)) x (2....,/3 - 1..../3 /(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / 1_..
So, the final output of this (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) is nearly: (+0.5-(-0.5) +1-(-1)) x (2/3 - 1/3 /(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / 1_..
According to the Standard Model of Particle Physics,
the Spin of most elementary particles = 1/2 (or 0.5)
the Charge of some Quarks = 2/3
the Charge of other Quarks = -1/3
the Charge of electrons = -1
According to my mathematical calculations the +1 dimension is unstable because there is already a larger +2/3 dimension against the -1/3 dimension, so that can be the reason to disappear the charge in neutrinos.
I think my mathematical calculations clearly show a similarity to the elementary particles in the Standard Model in Particle Physics.
- W. Suresh Madusanka
(This is my second part of The Theory Of Everything.)
He is Mi and I am Yu:
@Suresh Madusanka I'm not a theoretical physicist, so I'm not sure I fully understand your theory. But nice to hear it matches up with the standard model.
Have you, by any chance, been able to calculate the masses of elementary particles from your theory? Or maybe other constants like the Gravitational constant or Sommerfeld's constant?
Suresh Madusanka (4AM):
@He is Mi and I am Yu, I still didn't try to investigate more about it. And I just took very few hours to think about it yet. I hope to try to calculate the masses and other constants mathematically, but I guess it will take few months to give my full attention for it again. And I'll have to do the investigation alone, but I'll try to collect more details about the standard model to use those things to think more about the mathematical possibilities of my mathematical formulas again soon or later. Thank you so much for your replies.
------------------------
Why Buddhism Is True
Nathaniel Hall:
@Suresh Madusanka Theres really proof supporting buddism?
Suresh Madusanka:
@Nathaniel Hall , There are proofs about rebirth, power of mind (reading and influence mind and etc), evolution (The Buddha said about the evolution of life.), Purification of mind (power of meditation), The natural possibility to perform miracles (Eg: levitation, moving and bending objects from mind) (quantum tunneling, quantum entanglement and etc), Existence of Heavens, and brahma world in other dimensions (Time is a dimension, and the Dark Matter exists in a invisible dimension), Galaxy Clusters, Galaxies and solar systems in Buddhism and etc: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxxQfSqXDbI
Thidaswin Athsara:
@Suresh Madusanka Bro how do you know this much things? I am also learning buddhism and i am also hoping to write a book, or an article about the Buddhism and Science, Where do you live? from where u are, Sri lanka? I am learning from Waharaka thero.
Suresh Madusanka:
@Thidaswin Athsara, You can read my 'bauddha-tharka blogspot'' and buddhist-essentials-and-concepts blogspot' blogs to see how I collected and developed my knowledge about Buddhism, Science and etc. I didn't want to waste my replies, and I wanted to collect and share the reasons why someone should convert to Buddhism (I converted to Buddhism from Roman Catholic), so that is why I made those blogs. My father is a Buddhist but he didn't teach me about Buddhism, but when I was around 7-9 years he told me that Jesus could perform miracles from the power of meditation, but it didn't convert me to Buddhism. I converted to Buddhism because when I was around 11 years old a buddhist asked me to find the reasons to good and bad births, and why some people extremely suffer, and etc. Most religions ignore the suffering which we can clearly see in the animal world, but the Buddhism explain about the suffering of all living beings. I usually try to use a lot of time to think, research, study, analyse before I answer, because I had enough time for it. So if you have enough time, then you can do the same. I'm from Colombo. You can discuss with me online (smlanka.lk@gmail.com, Skype: suresh.slk).
------------------------------------------------
Roger Penrose - Did the Universe Begin?
Suresh Madusanka:
A Big Bang is a start of an Aeon (Kalpa: A great kalpa is 4 medium kalpas). Existence of the Aeons (Kalpa) in Buddhism shows a start and an end of the Universe again and again.
Buddhism explain about four quarters of the Universe from start to the end:
First quarter – time taken for this world to form. (after the Big Bang)
Second quarter – stable duration of this world where all living beings can thrive.
Third quarter – time taken for this world to be destroyed.
Fourth quarter – empty time period. (the accelerated Universe can convert the form into waves)
"A world that is a thousand times a thousandfold minor world system is called a thousand-to-the-second-power middling world system. 514 (3) A world that is a thousand times a thousand-to-the-second-power middling world system is called a thousand-to-the-third-power great world system. Ananda, the Tathagata can convey his voice as far as he wants in a thousand-to-the-third-power great world system." - The Tathagata (The Buddha) (Anguttara Nikaya The Numerical Discourse 277 |Page:314)
If the first 1000 world systems (small universe) = A Galaxy,
then the thousand-to-the-second-power middling world system (1000x1000) = Maybe the 'Dark Matter' combine groups of galaxies making a thousand-to-the-second-power middling world system (middle universe),
And then a 1000 middling world systems (1000x1000x1000) = thousand-to-the-third-power great world system (the triple thousand–great universe)
"All of the great universe [that comprises many thousands of middle and small universes] undergoes the cycle of creation and destruction," (LengthyDiscourses Page: 152)
According to Buddhist Quantum Physics there are 8 elementary ghosts (particles) called Pure Eight (Pali: SuddhΔtthaka). It sounds like that there are 8 invisible elementary particles with some activities as Ghosts. Those 8 different types of activities made information, atoms etc. According to my mathematical calculations the elementary particles (of the standard model in particle physics) received the nature of matter and antimatter. The Universe made only 16 elementary particles with the nature of matter and antimatter and a Higgs boson, and the Universe didn't make another 16 elementary particles with the nature of antimatter only, but maybe the Universe made another 16 elementary particles against the other 16 elementary particles which caused to annihilate each other, but when the dimensional formations used dimensions to form particles, mass and charge between dimensions or something like that caused a tiny unbalance of the Ratio of the Matter quarks and Antimatter quarks in the early Universe (3000000001:300000000) which caused to survive a set of elementary particles. But the Universe doesn't have a process to make 32 particles at once, and the opposite 16 particles completely vanish during the process. So I think that is why sometimes matter particles make antimatter particles. I think that the quantum nature of matter has a connection to Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas. And the quantum nature of antimatter has a connection to it too, so the Pure Eight (Pali: SuddhΔtthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas which comes under 4 elementary ghosts and another 4 with only the characters of the elementary ghosts are the two groups of elementary particles which sounds like a group of matter and a group of antimatter. - Suresh
Finding The Dimensions In The Universe Mathematically:
According to this mathematical formula: (a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2
Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)^6
= (+1-(-1))^3 x (+0.0-0.0)^3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: SuddhΔtthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas
Step 1:
i: (+1-(-1))^3 =
A: + (+1)3
B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)
C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))
D: + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (
E: + (+1)2 x (-1)
F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))
H: + (-1)3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)^3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Step 2:
(+1-(-1))^3 x (+(1)-(-(1)))= 8 elementary particles x (+(1)-(-(1))) = 16 elementary particles
Output of this (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) is nearly: (+0.5-(-0.5) +1-(-1)) x (2/3 - (1/3)xNull/(5/5) + (1/3)xNull/(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..
According to the Standard Model of Particle Physics,
the Spin of most elementary particles = 1/2 (or 0.5)
the Charge of some Quarks = 2/3
the Charge of other Quarks = -1/3
the Charge of electrons = -1
I think my mathematical calculations clearly show a similarity to the elementary particles in the Standard Model in Particle Physics. - Suresh
-----------------------------------------------------------Elementary Magics & Mathematical Structures Of The Entangled Dimensions (The Theory Of Everything?)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are Axions Dark Matter?
Suresh Wanayalae:
Maybe an Axion (which requires to remove the Strong CP problem (theta)) is two pairs of elementary particles with a relatively neutral charge like this: (A(0.5 spin, 2/3 charge) + X(-0.5 spin, 1/3 charge)) is equal to (A+X)ion or AXion.
Suresh Ran Rahas shared a link.
This is about the beginning of dimensions and the universe. There are quantum superpositions according to experiments and theories of particle physics. But this is not about particle physics.!
This is a new theory. The universe should be a process of symmetric mathematical probabilities. The 6 main directions make dimensions. A non dimensional zero (or zero infinity - 0∞) should be equal to dimensional zeros ((+-0)^6) as a separation from the infinity, which makes a density in dimensional zeros while going back to infinity. And it should always be based on the 6 main directions to be symmetric. And it should be equal to (+-1-+0.0+-0.0-+1)^3 as well. But it should be a 4 symmetric formations of existence:
1st formation:
(-+0.0+-1-+1+-0.0),
2nd formation:
(-+0.0+-1+-0.0-+1),
3rd formation:
(+-1-+0.0+-0.0-+1),
4th formation:
(+-1-+0.0-+1+-0.0).
When a formation is active between 3 standard dimensions using the 6 directions of it, with the plus (+) and minus (-) probabilities, it can become 64 cyclic probabilities as a symmetric continuation of dimensions between up and down (-+0.0+-1-+1+-0.0) without changing it for 4 times, and also between symmetric left and right (-+0.0+-1-+1+-0.0) without changing it for 4 times, while changing the dimensional probabilities between forward and back, [as symmetric forward and back (-+0.0+-1-+1+-0.0), and then forward and back (+-0.0+-1-+1-+0.0), and then forward and back (+-0.0-+1+-1-+0.0), and then forward and back (-+0.0-+1+-1+-0.0)] allowing a total 4 symmetric probabilities. And same like that there are 4 dimensional probabilities for symmetric left and right with 4 symmetric forward and back probabilities for each. And same like that there are 4 dimensional probabilities for symmetric up and down with 16 dimensional probabilities for each. Then it can become 64 x 4 symmetric probabilities of formations.
According to Buddhism there are 4 periods of 64 destructions within a great aeon (called Maha-Kalpa). And it sounds like a process of cyclic mathematical probabillities too. Can you imagine how mathematical probabilities become endless cycles like that? - This is from W. Suresh Madusanka, who is the author of the book "Finding The Entanglement Of Binary Mathematical Structures Of The Elementary Ghosts".
Share this video as much as possible.!
Mathematical Science And Buddhism With Cyclic Probabilities Of The Universe
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Model DUNKS on the Big Bang! π
Suresh Wanayalae:
Thank you so much for the outstanding explanation and analysis on this topic Dr. Brain Keating. It is a reasonable and almost scientific explanation that may be true or falsifiable. There are a lot of details in the video which we can use to study more about that topic. I'm studying about it too.
I think, there are mathematical probabilities of zero (0) which leads to symmetric cyclic probabilities of the universe.
As an example:
1st formation:
(-+0.0+-1-+1+-0.0),
2nd formation:
(-+0.0+-1+-0.0-+1),
3rd formation:
(+-1-+0.0+-0.0-+1),
4th formation:
(+-1-+0.0-+1+-0.0).
But the superposition and probabilities of 0.0 and 1 would make 0.0/1, 0.0x1, 1/0.0, 1x0.0 as a 2 dimensional cycle (*these symbols 'x' and '/' or '\' show directions only.). And then it would make different probabilities like this:
1st formation:
(-+0.0/+-1 -+1\+-0.0),
2nd formation:
(-+0.0x+-1 -+1x+-0.0),
3rd formation:
(+-1/-+0.0 +-0.0\-+1),
4th formation:
(+-1x-+0.0 +-0.0x-+1).
Using a Superposition of 0.0 and 1 to find symmetric probabilities is better because it shows that it almost neutralize a side of a dimensional 0 (Eg: +-0). And this symmetry (-+0.0x+-1 -+1x+-0.0) is more symmetric than this symmetry (-+0.0+-1+-0.0-+1),. And those probabilities show a 2-dimensional cycle like a probabilistic rotation in every direction which we can see in galaxies and solar systems as well. But a big universal rotation can destroy the current formation of the universe as a new universal quantum entanglement or a universal bounce that rotates dimensions (Eg: from up to left, or from up to right, or from up to back, or from up to forward) while moving to the next formation of the symmetric probabilities of the entangled and conditioned universal zero (0).
- Suresh Wanayalaege
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quantum Entanglement Demystified - How does it really work?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Is The Big Bounce Theory?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outstanding Discovery About The Origin Of The Universe
Double Slit Experiment Explained
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How do neutrino oscillations work? | Even Bananas
Suresh Wanayalae:
I think the spin of neutrinos is connected to an unstable dimension. According to my theory, it has a 0.5 spin as 0.5+0.5 between 3 standard dimensions. And when it travels it can make 3 types of neutrinos for each dimension. If it takes only one 0.5 for a spin then the other 0.5 should try to be stable making dimensions like 1-0.5. And again it can become unstable because it has created another unstable -0.5 dimension too. So it should try to be stable again making dimensions like -1+0.5. And if elementary particles don't have an extra 0.5 unstable dimension, then those 3 types of elementary particles in the 3 standard dimensions should be stable (without changing the flavor, but if it has a 0.5 spin then it can be unstable when it generally uses more than 1 standard dimension too. And forces with a spin equal to 1 should be stable in standard dimensions. So it sounds like that there are 3 layers with some forces including 2 hidden layers of forces as similar layers of quantum fields. But it can become 2-dimensional forces and 1-dimensional forces as well on interactions or influence of the other 3 types of particles.). I think the first layer (Up Quark, Down Quark, Electron, Electron Neutrino) in the standard model is generally based on only 1 main standard dimension. And generally, there is 1 more standard dimension (like 1-1) in the second layer. And same like that, there are 2 more standard dimensions in the third layer. - S.W.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing new types of fundamental forces and particles for Quantum Physics
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ΰ·ිΰ·්ΰ·ΰΆΊ ΰ·ැΰΆ―ුΰΆ± ΰ·ිΰΆ―ිΰΆΊ ΰΆැΰΆ± ΰΆΈං ΰΆ½ිΰΆΊΰΆ΄ු ΰΆ΄ොΰΆΰΆ් researchgate ΰ·ෙΰΆΆ් ΰΆ
ΰΆ©ΰ·ිΰΆΊේ Verifying The Origin Of Everything ΰΆ±ΰΆΈිΰΆ±් ΰΆ΄ΰΆ½ ΰΆΰΆ»ΰΆ½ ΰΆිΰΆΊΰΆ±ΰ·ා. ΰΆΰΆ Download ΰΆΰΆ»ΰΆෙΰΆ± ΰΆ ΰΆැΰΆ± ΰΆ
ΰΆ―ΰ·ΰ·් ΰΆΰΆ―ිΰΆ»ිΰΆ΄ΰΆ් ΰΆΰΆ»ΰΆ±්ΰΆ± ΰ·ෝ ΰΆΰΆෙ ΰΆ
ΰΆ©ුΰΆ΄ාΰΆ©ු ΰΆ΄ෙΰΆ±්ΰ·ΰΆ±්ΰΆ± ΰΆΰΆ්ΰ·ΰ· ΰΆΰΆ»ΰΆ±්ΰΆ±. 
' xlink:href='%23b'/%3e%3cuse fill='black' filter='url(%23c)' xlink:href='%23b'/%3e%3cpath fill='white' d='M10.473 4C8.275 4 8 5.824 8 5.824S7.726 4 5.528 4c-2.114 0-2.73 2.222-2.472 3.41C3.736 10.55 8 12.75 8 12.75s4.265-2.2 4.945-5.34c.257-1.188-.36-3.41-2.472-3.41'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e){kind=small}
Verifying The Origin Of Everything - Mathematical Science and Buddhism
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do all bodies experience the same acceleration regardless of their mass, i.e., why is the inertial and gravitational mass the same???
It is wondering that in the GRT is strongly based on the "inertial mass" notion, when simultaneously SRT is based on the "rest mass", as it is claimed and convincing in the article attached below....
What do you really understand under the "mass" notion???
Best!!
15th Jan, 2022
What do you really understand under the "mass" notion???
Best!!
15th Jan, 2022
General Relativity ignores the existence of Gravitons and the speed/flow of gravity when objects move fast. The speed of an object can impact gravity. Eg: "If ‘Planet 9’ doesn’t exist (is small) or leaves orbit, the speed of the sun had an impact on the orbits of Trans-Neptunian Objects."
The acceleration of objects would depend on the medium they travel as a mathematical interaction with the medium. So if the space could stretch for any reason, then the speed would change too. It would be like jumping through a connected arrangement of rubber bands regardless of the level of the stretch of it.
If quantum gravity is a result of an elementary particle that it produces on interactions (Eg: beta decay, nuclear reactions), without depending directly on the inertial mass of that object, and if the gravitational mass of an object is different from the inertial mass of that object, then the equivalence principle is wrong.
I guess some people would not like to accept that Gravity is an emergence from elementary particles. Because if that is the case, then they would need to change the current standard model of cosmology that explains the early stages in the universe. They try to say that the universe started from Planck Scale when the time was almost equal to zero (Planck Time) according to General Relativity (like creating a perfect universe from nothing as creationism). But if the General Relativity is not fundamental, then the universe could be many sets of energies like many Planck energies (n×1.22×10^19GeV). But some evidence and my calculations suggest that General Relativity and also entropy can’t explain the size of the singularity or the energy packet in the early universe.
And a related question arises: one has a monochromatic electromagnetic wave (photon) flying in the space and close enough to the Sun. Find its deviation from the straight line motion caused by the Sun gravity, acting on the electromagnetic wave.
Does somebody know a solution to this problem, or where from one can extract such a solution?
Best regards and thanks in advance!
Does somebody know a solution to this problem, or where from one can extract such a solution?
Best regards and thanks in advance!
Anatolij K. Prykarpatski, Prof. Albert Einstien was dealing with the curvature (Geometry) in space that could behave like a force. So it's not like discovering a force that causes gravity. We use his energy equation (into this, E=mc^2 equation) to use it with light to measure the energy in mass. And it is not his equation (Einstien's Equation) about General Relativity. So there is a clear difference between his theories about energy and gravity. So the General Relativity is not about energy. Energy depends on mass, but gravity would depend on an elementary particle. Eg:
1.) “NASA X-ray Telescopes Find Black Hole May Be a Neutrino Factory”-Nasa (13-11-2014, R:14-169).
2.) Around 2 hours before the supernova 1987a star explosion (that happened when a dying star turned into a small Black Hole) the dying star started to release energy as neutrinos and continued that for around 2 hours before releasing light. But that light was only around 1% of the total energy that the star released, and around 99% of energy was released as neutrinos before making a Black Hole.
I suggest that if we can remove all the neutrinos from an object, it would not be able to create gravity.
I have explained a lot of details about elementary particles and forces in my research book (It will be updated with a few more details and better grammar in February):
Preprint Verifying The Origin Of Everything
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Suresh Wanayalae added a new photo to the album: Existence of the Universe and Life.
Verifying the Origin of Everything with Binary Mathematical Physics and Buddhism: (ΰΆΰΆ«ිΰΆΰΆΈΰΆΊ ΰΆΆΰΆΊිΰΆ±ΰΆ»ි ΰΆ·ෞΰΆිΰΆ ΰ·ිΰΆ―්ΰΆΊාΰ· ΰ·ΰ· ΰΆΆුΰΆ―ු ΰΆ―ΰ·ΰΆΈ ΰΆΈΰΆිΰΆ±් ΰ·ෑΰΆΈ ΰΆ―ෙΰΆΊΰΆΰΆΈ ΰΆΰΆ»ΰΆΈ්ΰΆ·ΰΆΊ ΰΆΰ·ΰ·ුΰΆ»ු ΰΆිΰΆ»ීΰΆΈ) https://www.researchpublish.com/pdfviewer/Verifying%20the%20Origin-22022022-2.pdf
The Big Bang Theory in Buddhism
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Catholic meets Sufi, talks about Buddhism (Didn't expect this)
Ψ§Ψ¨Ω ΨΉΩ
Ψ± Ψ§ΩΨ¬Ψ¨ΩΨ±Ω:
The more I learn about other religions, the more grateful I am to Allah for being a Muslim.
Deon Liberator:
Jesus said, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.”
But Muhammad at 54 years old took them to bed.
Do trust Jesus or Muhammad for your eternal salvation?
Jesus said he is the only way to get to God. (Messiah)
Suresh Wanayalaege:
Buddhism is scientific. There are ultimate realities called Paramartha (Paramount) Dhamma: 28 Material forms/Rupa (4 great + 24 derived material forms), 52 Mental Factors/fields, mind (Citta) moment, and Nibbana (disappearance). Furthermore, there are small matter zones (Rupa-Kalapa) with 17 Citta/mind moments. There are three 3 moments in a mind moment like a wave moment. A moment of observation in the mind/Citta has a minimum of 7 qualities/activities called 'fair for all the minds' (Sabba Citta Sadharana), the mental activities/factors (Cetasika). It is a big process that happens during a single observation of the mind. Those 7 simultaneous activities are as follows: 1. Touch, Collision (Passa), 2. Feeling, Intensity (Vedana), 3. Signal, Reminder (Sangna), 4. Intention, Action (Chethana), 5. One-pointedness, Concentration (Ekaggatha), 6. Vitality, Life Faculty/Density (Jivitindriya), 7. Mental Advertence, Remembering (Manasikara). Also, there are 52 mental factors/activities that join with the mind/Citta in many different combinations while making a mind/Citta moment. Likely, the mind/Citta doesn't require an external soul to remind the previous activity of the consciousness/Citta. As mentioned in Buddhist texts, a moment of consciousness/Citta is filled with a lot of simultaneous functions that can behave like a stream of souls (living moments). The mind/Citta is NOT the only absolute reality mentioned in those earliest texts. The smallest material/Rupa unit lives for 51 smallest moments repeatedly. Also, the mind/Citta usually continues a series of mind/Citta activities (Citta Vithi) like a thought process within 51 smallest moments. So likely, the mind moment depends on the lifetime of the material units. The Buddha didn't reject the existence of the material world outside of the mind. The mathematical research called verifying the origin of everything explains the existence of those realities.
TheWayToSalvation:
@Suresh Wanayalaege as a former Buddhist I don't think Siddharta Buddha was a scientist.
This is another example of people changing his teachings to re-interpret them in their manner. Like the bhuddists that made him God instead of a teacher.
Buddhism is a lifestyle but doesn't answer the most inportant questions.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@TheWayToSalvation, The Buddha explained the process of mind and matter. Abhidhamma mentions matter zones that make matter body/particle (Rupa Sarira) that can make a connected Collection/atom (Rupa Santhana). Also, it mentions generations of elements (Rupa Santathi). I could verify it theoretically. The early Buddhist texts mention a rain of energized water (like water sticks, water robs, etc) fills the world (island universe) gradually and stays stably filled for a long time until cosmic air (virtual particles) comes into the filled world (island universe), causing to start the expansion. And then, the world (island universe) stays stably expanded until the contraction.” Virtual particles in space (like air) can come into low-density areas of space (between galaxies) from outside of the island universe until those virtual particles can go there with a maximum speed (up to the speed of light) to distribute virtual particles uniformly between galaxies. Also, the Buddha said, "There comes a time, Vasettha, when, after a long period, this world contracts. At a time of contraction, beings are mostly born in the Abhassara Brahma world. The beings were made of mind, fed on bliss and joy, self-luminous, traveled across the air, and were glorious, and they stayed like that for a very long time. But sooner or later, after a very long period, this world begins to expand again. At a time of expansion, the beings from the Abhassara Brahma world passed away and are mostly reborn in this world. Here they dwell, mind-made, feeding on delight, self-luminous, moving through the air, glorious, and they stay like that for a very long time. At that time, it was pitched darkness all over with no sun or moon, no day or night.". Buddhism is a very big subject, and most people don't know Buddhism well. I left the Roman Catholic religion when I was 11 years old, and I could find a lot of answers from Buddhism. Buddhist teachings are better than illogical fairy tales.
TheWayToSalvation:
@Suresh Wanayalaege There is a difference on saying a life or philosophy is "scientific" and sayin I interpret it this way.
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@TheWayToSalvation, It is not an interpretation. The Buddha himself said that fundamentally there are 4 great elements (ghosts/Bhutas) called Maha-Bhuta. Also, he said that it made 8 pure elements called Pure Eight (Suddhattaka in Pali), and they made 24 formations that exist in a material zone. What I'm trying to say is that I already discovered those elements mathematically. So it is scientific now.
TheWayToSalvation:
@Suresh Wanayalaege just because you found it? You do know how scientific research works right?
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@TheWayToSalvation, Not only because I found it. The Buddha's explanation is also scientific because he used a different analogy to represent those fundamental elements. He named those fundamental formations with names of qualities that anyone can think to exist in reality. So both ways are scientific.
TheWayToSalvation:
@Suresh Wanayalaege my point was in order to call it scientific it means another scientist should come to the same results as you
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@TheWayToSalvation, Yes of course. That is undoubtedly possible. Each step in the calculation is derivable. Also, the result of the calculation is compatible with modern science and better than modern scientific explanations. Also, I could find major errors in scientific explanations. E.g., The electric field is actually a magnetic field. And the magnetic field is actually an electric field. It is the end of false interpretations in modern science.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
to you44 minutes ago
3 minutes ago- to youan hour ago
- Just now
The Supreme Buddha Explained The Origin Of The Observable Universe
Big Bang: Tweak it or throw it out?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How Many Universes Are There In The Multiverse?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2G1QL_itlI
Suresh Wanayalaege:
The Big Bang and cosmic inflation theories are western lies like creationism. Some shameless creationists and their supporters try to maintain those lies even if a lot of evidence disproved those theories. They try to ignore the existence of galaxies older than 13.8 billion years shown by the JWST. Also, their fine-tuning arguments show their ignorence.
Jack Foreman:
Hello, as a shameless creationist I do not quite know how to take your comment when it comes to a few of the ideas you mentioned. Do you have a thorough and comprehensive and accurate understanding into the nature of things broadly speaking that affords you a basis on which to discount certain ideas of others? Also, how do you qualify the reason for attribution of shame?
Suresh Wanayalaege:
@Jack Foreman, Yes, some eastern knowledge and mathematical calculations helped me to understand some major processes in nature. Popular scientific explanations are using a lot of assumptions, principles, illogical hypothesis, wrong interpretations, and a lot of irrelevent arguments. And sometimes, they ignore and hide some facts to bend the mind of their students and maintain a set of lies to make the mindset they want to create and popularize through educated people. And they have made and popularized standard models to reject other models carelessly even if their models are highly speculative and incomplete. They directly or indirectly force people to believe the origin of time and matter in the observable universe showing their hypothetical models. They have lost their common sense and curiosity, and they try to do the same to others.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How To Test Einstein's Relativity For Less Than $100:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1plELH0qXhE
@smlanka4u:
Time-dialation is an illuson of quantum wave symmetries. High-energy muons are not normal muons, and they don't decay faster. But it doesn't show a time-dialation. They are just behaving differently due to their higher speed. Quantum waves have hidden symmetries that can make the illusion of time-dialation. Slowing down the decaying process of a muon due to their high-energy mass doesn't show a time-dialation. It only shows a different wave symmetry in a different type of muon. It is obvious that high-energy photons, muons, and protons can't behave like a low-energy photon, muon, and proton. Therefore, they have different lifetimes.
@brothermine2292:
@smlanka4u : No, muons are inherently unstable and short-lived. Photons are stable. Protons may be stable too... no one has ever detected a spontaneous proton decay, even though people have tried hard,
@smlanka4u:
@brothermine2292, High-energy protons are not the original protons because they have an extra mass. Also, high-energy muons are not the original muons because they also have an extra mass with their higher speed. Therefore, time-dialation is an illusion created by the stable symmetry of the extra mass and its speed. It is common sense, and you can use your brain to understand it if you don't want to be brainwashed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ΰΆ΄ΰΆ්ΰ·ΰΆ΄ාΰΆී ΰ·ΰΆΈ්ΰΆΈුΰΆිΰΆΈΰΆΊ ΰ·ිΰΆ―්ΰΆΊාΰ·ΰΆ§ ΰΆ ΰΆ·ිΰΆΊෝΰΆΰΆΊΰΆ් -- A challenge for the biased conventional science
Dependent Origination-How not to teach it
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ΰΆාΰΆ½ΰΆΊ ΰΆ±ΰΆΰΆ» ΰΆΰΆ±ොΰΆ් ΰΆΈොΰΆ±ΰ· ΰ·ෙΰΆΊිΰΆ―? 
ΰΆΰΆΊාΰΆ§ ΰ·ිΰΆෙΰΆ± ΰ·ිΰΆ―ිΰ·ΰΆ§ ΰΆාΰΆ½ΰΆΊ ΰΆිΰΆΊΰΆ±්ΰΆ±ෙ ΰΆΈොΰΆΰΆ්ΰΆ―? 
' xlink:href='%23b'/%3e%3cuse fill='black' filter='url(%23c)' xlink:href='%23b'/%3e%3cpath fill='white' d='M12.162 7.338c.176.123.338.245.338.674 0 .43-.229.604-.474.725a.73.73 0 01.089.546c-.077.344-.392.611-.672.69.121.194.159.385.015.62-.185.295-.346.407-1.058.407H7.5c-.988 0-1.5-.546-1.5-1V7.665c0-1.23 1.467-2.275 1.467-3.13L7.361 3.47c-.005-.065.008-.224.058-.27.08-.079.301-.2.635-.2.218 0 .363.041.534.123.581.277.732.978.732 1.542 0 .271-.414 1.083-.47 1.364 0 0 .867-.192 1.879-.199 1.061-.006 1.749.19 1.749.842 0 .261-.219.523-.316.666zM3.6 7h.8a.6.6 0 01.6.6v3.8a.6.6 0 01-.6.6h-.8a.6.6 0 01-.6-.6V7.6a.6.6 0 01.6-.6z'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e){kind=small}
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You Think You’re REAL?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4n34Izmk4I
@smlanka4u:
The relationship between matter, feelings, identifications, emotions, and knowledge is the continuation of life, and that relationship can continue through blood or any other medium.
Thomasp671:
This is a very good video that explains a lot of what I'm talking about here but I do not believe that consciousness itself is created by the brain.... I believe the brain is just an interpretation of what we see of reality.... in other words our sensory perception, our five senses, the brain is being used as a tool to processing all of this information so our consciousness can understand it... this conscious energy that I see all around us... this conscious energy that is all around us is momentarily inside the shell that is Tom Pickett... using the brain to interpret and process the world around us...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Happened to JWST Galaxies That Seemed Too Far to Be Real?
@smlanka4u:
CMB radiation didn't show a Big Bang. The father of the Big Bang theory is a catholic priest. It is not a scientific theory. According to the Buddha's teachings, the cyclic process of this universe repeated more than the sand particles in the Ganges river. The duration of a cyclic period is called a Maha-Kalpa (Great Aeon), and it contains four Asankeiya Kalpas (innumarable eons). The period of expansion is called a Vivatta Kalpa. The stable expansion period is called a Vivattasthai Kalpa. The period of contraction is called a Sanvatta Kalpa. The stable contraction period is called a Sanvattasthai Kalpa. A cosmic liquid material rain called Sampaththi Maha Megha filled the early universe during the Sanvattasthai Kalpa. And then, the Sakwala (world/solar system) formed during the Vivatta Kalpa. And then, another rain of liquid matter destroys the Sakwala.
@NuisanceMan:
@smlanka4u And you're complaining about not being scientific?
@smlanka4u:
@NuisanceMan, Yes, they included it to the standard model of cosmology as if they know it for sure. Science is not a their property, and they don't own it. Also, they can't make science. Sometimes, they don't care whether it is right or wrong, and they want to brainwash people. Sometimes, their shamelessness becomes limitless because of their blind faith or political reasons. A few people liked to believe that very massive and matured galaxies could form within 300 million years after the Big Bang to maintain the Big Bang theory in the standard model of cosmology even if it is not a scientific belief and they couldn't predict it before the JWST discovered them.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
034 | Fundamentals of Theravada Buddhism | RΕ«pa | Maggavihari Thera | IIT
036 | Fundamentals of Theravada Buddhism | RΕ«pa | Maggavihari Thera | IIT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-I8kP8LV4ww
@smlanka4u:
Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu. Probably, Kammaja Rupas are like inter-related groups of matter like entangled quantum particles. π
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- to you4 hours ago
- 5 minutes ago
- to you44 minutes ago
- 2 minutes ago
- to you26 minutes ago
- 3 minutes ago
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's What Scientists Think Happened Before the Big Bang: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiLTviMAoTY
@smlanka4u:
The Big Bang theory is a western lie because the lifetime of the distance galaxies shown by JWST is older than the Big Bang.
@Cosmoknowledge:
I suggest you re-evaluate the data on your mind. π❤️
@smlanka4u:
@Cosmoknowledge, Western scientists try to ignore and hide it because of their limitless shamelessness and blind faith.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No, the Universe ISN'T 27 Billion Years Old!: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_45U7IjIJDk
@DrBrianKeating:
How old is the Universe? Did we change your mind? Let me know π
@jasonmcghee1266:
I hope the Universe is much older. That would be exciting to me.
@imthemoeron:
The moment that anyone says they know for sure how old the universe is, you can be 99% sure they're wrong. Nobody will ever know for sure
Cuan Tin:
Scientific theories should not be totalitarian, and that is the main problem with Big Bang models. Big Bang proponents function like a single totalitarian party in power that not allow anything else. The Big bang is wrong, and it does not allow other models
These people defend the BB mode llike those who were very sure that the earth was the center of the universe
Sky Darmos:
Exactly, Big Bang theory has made only one prediction, and that was wrong.
@smlanka4u:
Big Bang is a lie, and her lies are big like her. Big Bounce is scientific because it is true even if Nasa ignores it. High-energy cosmic rays could collide and make matter and antimatter in the early universe from more than 20 billlion years. She is crying to protect the model of creationists. Mathematical theories didn't prove the Big Bang theory. This is the right time to start laughing out loud at Big Bang theorists.
@jazzunit8234:
This woman is a hypocrite
@ericanderson4201:
Amateur hour. Unsubscribed.
THE BENJAMINS:
she knows nothing actually
Mario Power:
There is a big chance that there was no big bang at all. Maybe a big bounce theory is the right one?
Sky Darmos:
Big Bang never happened. The highest temperature was 6000 Kelvin.
The Big Bang has exactly zero legitimacy. Big Bang theory isn’t a theory, because it doesn’t predict a thing.
Big Bang theory has zero evidence.
She doesn’t realize that everything she has learned is just a pseudoscience model.
The way academia works prevents real research.
A theory needs to make predictions.
The only prediction was the abundance of light elements in the universe. This prediction was wrong. It is known as the lithium problem.
Literally everything in mainstream cosmology is utterly wrong.
slamRN:
Check the cooling curve of white dwarfs.
Sky Darmos:
SlamRN: exactly, white dwarfs take trillions of years to form and to cool to the level they have. 99% of white dwarfs are older than the universe/13.8 billion years. You can determine that only with white dwarfs.
They literally use a preset timeline of the universe to then use element abundance in stars to estimate the age of stars. It is totally ridiculous.
The notion that the universe can be formed like a ball is ridiculous.
The supermassive black holes with the largest masses have the largest redshifts.
Universities are basically indoctrination camps.
Sergei Kharebov:
Big bang theory on its way out
csiri:
the universe is actually infinite years old
wilhelmschumann:
The Big Bamng Theory will not survive
Trevor Haryett:
i thought big bang theory was thrown out long time ago
Sky Darmos:
Big Bang theory is a silly theory that got replaced by an even more silly theory called inflation theory.
Inflation theory: inflate the universe by a factor of 10^60 because the chance to have a flat universe is 1 in 10^60. Very silly.
The universe’s expansion accelerates because the entropy of black hole grows quadratic too.
Principled Uncertainty:
Jesus, this is how it ends
andrew nicholas:
I don't believe any of you know. It surely isn't 13.8. Go back to the drawing board with your buddies.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pratitya Samutpada | (Part 1) | Buddhist Doctrine of Dependent Origination | 5th Sem Indian Phil.
@smlanka4u:
Material things can have Vijnana (knowingness/consciousness) for a moment during their existing (Thiti) moment. Sense organs (Salayathana) are not life. Contact/Touch (Sparsa/Passa) is the start of life, but it is not the life. Sense organs (Salayathana) can exist without a life too. Feeling (Vedana) is the life we experience, but material things can feel something with a touch too. Therefore, feeling is not a life. Greed/Craving (Thrushna) is the first unique feature of life. Thank you.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Big Bang never Happened
Discussion Started
Erich J. Lerner has written an excellent book about how mankind, become so attached to a frame of reference, that is almost impossible, to make a real paradigm shift; in this case it has to do with the theory of the Big Bang, he writes:
“THE PLASMA ALTERNATIVE
The test of scientific theory is the correspondence of predictions and observation, and the Big Bang has flunked. It predicts that there should be no objects in the universe older than twenty billion years and larger than 150 million light-years across. There are. It predicts that the universe, on such a large scale, should be smooth and homogeneous. The universe isn't. The theory predicts that, to produce the galaxies we see around us from the tiny fluctuations evident in the microwave background, there must be a hundred times as much dark matter as visible matter. There's no evidence that there's any dark matter at all. And if there is no dark matter, the theory predicts, no galaxies will form. Yet there they are, scattered across the sky. We live in one.”
Why is it so difficult to make a paradigm shift even in science?
This was the case with complex numbers too, as is shown in “An Imaginary Tale The Story of sqr(-1), by an Emerithus Professor of EE, in the University of New Hampshire, Paul J. Nahim
Suresh Wanayalaege added a reply
Nothingness could grow with the unstoppable time while becoming positive and negative emptinesses of time relative to each other. Time is a moment of spacetime. A moment is a point of existence. A point of time is relative to the 6 directions and dimensions, and they exist relatively. Each point with time is like a baby universe. And they could make the relative existence relative to the directions and dimensions. Time could grow the universe, making and continuing the points of unstoppable time. The meaning of time is a continuation. Prof. Einstein can't change it using his principles. Everything experiences time, but sometimes it is not very obvious. Time could be the creator of everything, and time can move everything. It is extremely logical. Time is not a clock. The entire universe is completely new at each moment if time is the fundamental limit at each point. And those new points of time could make and maintain the limits of constants because the points of time are always new and relational to each other. Time could exist before space, and that is why anything starts and continues. Infinity is infinite if it is not relative. Infinite nothingness could be the infinite negative time in the completely nothing universe. And that moment of nothingness could be both infinitely large and infinitely small because it could not be relative to anything. And then, time could continue to the positive time from point to point because a small point of nothingness doesn't have a permanent location if time continues. Therefore, it could increase with time from point to point. Completely nothingness is also a thing even if nothing existed in the nothingness in the earliest universe. And time is the thing that must flow in the universe. The universe was a thing even if it was completely nothing because it was the only thing that could experience time. It is a simple logic. Time continues inside the Planck volume. And time is a fundamental reality even if it is completely new at each moment.
The entire universe had a start. But it doesn't mean that it had an infinite density and it started to expand like a balloon. It could start from a point, and it could expand from point to point. Therefore, the edge of the entire universe would expand forever. The eternal growth of the universe could start an uncountable time ago. Most probably, we only observe some parts of cyclic continuations in the observable universe. Real mathematics starts from zero, but some theorists tried to say that the universe started with strange mathematics that instantly jumps from nothingness to a point with an infinitely huge density. And they don't explain any reason for the growth of space after the formation of the infinite density. There is no reason to think that Black Holes make space (Dark Energy) while becoming more massive. Most likely, some Black Holes accelerate the flow of space materials between galaxies because they would absorb space materials to become more massive. A balloon expands somewhat uniformly when air comes into it, and space comes in while it is expanding. But it doesn't make extra material space. The earliest growth of the universe and some interactions could make both space and matter. The observable universe is not the entire universe as the nearest galaxy is not the only galaxy. And some theories only relate to the frame of reference. High-density space materials could come from all around the universe into low-density regions of space, causing an expansion if quantum gravity supported it. Space materials would travel faster or slower or at the speed of light depending on their interactions with forces and because the speed of light and other elements depends on the density of space (medium) and their wave symmetry (mass distribution). Presumably, light (photons) and similar high-speed waves represent highly symmetric cancellations of opposite dimensions while becoming. So then, electrons would represent an amount of widely effective uncancelled dimensions on its asymmetric structure. Thus, gluons likely contain overly cancelable dimensional structures that cancel dimensions in other materials too. Quantum fields can change mass and speed. Kinetic energy can't make mass, and it only represents high-speed mass.
My research:
Preprint Verifying The Origin Of Everything
Wolfgang Konle added a reply
Yes, I also think that the big bang never happened and that we live in a closed eternal universe, structured like a 3-sphere.
In this universe, star fuel gets recycled from black hole matter about after every 20 billion years. During that period a cosmic field, which warps the space to the 3-sphere shape, collects the energy needed for star fuel recycling via gravitational interaction from moving particles or photons.
The cosmic field compensates the negative energy density of gravitational fields.
The physical background of the theory is the fact, that the energy density of gravitational fields is negative and the fact that an absolute negative energy density cannot exist.
For further details refer to:
Preprint What gravitation really is
Suresh Wanayalaege added a reply
Dear Dr. Wolfgang Konle,
According to my analysis of the Buddha's teachings, a cyclic period of this island universe called Maha-Kalpa is approximately 1 trilion x 1 billion years or more than 2 trilion years.
In one explanation, there are four different lengths of kalpas. A regular kalpa is approximately 16 million years long (16,798,000 years), and a small kalpa is 1000 regular kalpas, or about 16.8 billion years. Further, a medium kalpa is roughly 336 billion years, the equivalent of 20 small kalpas. A great kalpa is four medium kalpas, or about 1.3 trillion years.
The Buddha said, "Imagine a huge empty cube at the beginning of a kalpa (a Great Aeon), approximately 16 miles (a yojana) in each side. Once every 100 years, you insert a tiny mustard seed into the cube. According to the Buddha, the huge cube will be filled even before the kalpa ends.
If you count the total number of sand particles at the depths of the Ganges river, from where it begins to where it ends at the sea, even that number will be less than the number of passed kalpas.
Were a man to take a piece of cloth of this most delicate texture [of fine cotton], and therewith to touch in the slightest possible manner, once in a hundred years, a solid rock, free from earth, a yojana [~14 miles] high, and as much broad, the time would come when it would be worn down, by this imperceptible trituration, to the size of a mung or undu seed. This period would be immense in its duration; but it has been declared by Buddha that it would not be equal to a Maha Kalpa."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Buddhism: The Principle of Dependent Origination (PratΔ«tyasamutpΔda)
No comments:
Post a Comment